Hi!
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 03:58:35PM -0500, Andrew Buck wrote:
> Regarding the 15,000 in Canada and 8,000 in New Zealand from imports, is
> this a case where a mechanical edit to fix them would be appropriate
> (with appropriate planning of course). Something like mechanically
> doing all the v
Regarding the 15,000 in Canada and 8,000 in New Zealand from imports, is
this a case where a mechanical edit to fix them would be appropriate
(with appropriate planning of course). Something like mechanically
doing all the version 1 objects with the relevant source tags would save
a lot of manual
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:40:41PM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> Is there anybody with more skill than I able to put a overpass routine for
> this?
> I prefer to check problems close to me than the randomness of roulette.
The basis for the maproulette challenges I am creating is, obviously,
programs that
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
> I don't know if this was an issue with previous renderings too, but what I
> also see are multipolygons that do not have a way that is inside it as
> member. The inside way still renders but the style of the outer will also
> render ov
Hi Dave, dear friends,
I just played around a little with overpass, and it's tricky. Finding
relations that contain tagged ways is easy. However, this gives lots of
false positives, as often the way is tagged correctly. Finding relations
with a tag X that contain a way that also has tag X is harde
Hi
Is there anybody with more skill than I able to put a overpass routine
for this?
I prefer to check problems close to me than the randomness of roulette.
Ta
DaveF
On 20/06/2017 10:24, Jochen Topf wrote:
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF t
I don't know if this was an issue with previous renderings too, but what
I also see are multipolygons that do not have a way that is inside it as
member. The inside way still renders but the style of the outer will
also render over the inside way.
Example here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relat
Thanks to you both (Jochen & Matthijs) now it is clear, no data are lost.
Sandor
-Original Message-
From: Matthijs Melissen [mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl]
Sent: 20 June 2017 12:59
To: Sandor Seres
Cc: Jochen Topf; OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering issues with Carto
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Sandor Seres wrote:
> I am not sure if I understand correctly the following extract from your
> letter
> >>
> ... In a huge effort in the last months we have removed old-style
> multipolygons from the OSM database completely, so this is a good step!...
On 20 June 2017 at 12:33, Sandor Seres wrote:
> ... In a huge effort in the last months we have removed old-style
> multipolygons from the OSM database completely, so this is a good step!...
> Please help me with a correct interpretation of "OSM database" in your letter.
The remaining old-style
I am not sure if I understand correctly the following extract from your letter
>>
... In a huge effort in the last months we have removed old-style multipolygons
from the OSM database completely, so this is a good step!...
>>
If Carto Style 4.0 ignores the mentioned cases, it is OK for us, users
On Tuesday 20 June 2017, Jochen Topf wrote:
>
> Unfortunately nobody really realized that as a side-effect of the
> update to Carto 4.0 many multipolygon relations would appear wrong on
> the map. This is the case for multipolygon relations that have the
> same tags on the relation as well as on (s
Hi!
In the last days the OpenStreetMap Carto Style 4.0 is being deployed on
the OSMF tile servers. This new version of the style doesn't take old-style
multipolygons (where the tags are on the outer ways instead of on the
relation) into account any more. In a huge effort in the last months we
have
13 matches
Mail list logo
