Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations

> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:07:02 -0700 > From: Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations > Perhaps we need a tag for an identifying string for a relation, which is > not supposed to be rendered? Why don't a ren

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 19:00 +0100, Andy Allan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > >> Recently, it appears that Mapnik has started rendering the name of > >> relations on the map, as if they were street names. For example

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew MacKinnon wrote: >> Recently, it appears that Mapnik has started rendering the name of >> relations on the map, as if they were street names. For example, it >> renders the name of the "Cosburn" bus route along Hal

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations

Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > Recently, it appears that Mapnik has started rendering the name of > relations on the map, as if they were street names. For example, it > renders the name of the "Cosburn" bus route along Haldon Avenue in > this map:

[OSM-talk] Rendering name of route relations

Recently, it appears that Mapnik has started rendering the name of relations on the map, as if they were street names. For example, it renders the name of the "Cosburn" bus route along Haldon Avenue in this map: . This is clearly unde