2009/11/26 Dan Karran d...@karran.net:
Please could somebody revert changesets 3204838 and 3204901? They both
relate to the centre of London and add/edit data incorrectly.
Done.
Please contact the user and explain why his changesets were reverted.
/ Grant
Please contact the user and explain why his changesets were reverted.
his/her
Regards,
Niklas
--
Niklas Holmkvist
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/11/26 Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com:
Done.
Please contact the user and explain why his changesets were reverted.
Thanks Grant. I sent a message to them about the changes yesterday and
haven't heard back, but will let them know it's been fixed.
Cheers,
Dan
--
Dan Karran
I need to revert part of
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3050941 - someone edited
live in Potlatch and screwed things up - he moved many nodes to some
silly position, then someone tried to fix it by restoring one of
affected ways... so I'd like to revert all node moves.
What is
Hi!
We have a problem in Irkutsk, Russia.
From August 2008 to February 2009, Evgeny
Mandrikovhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Evgeny%20Mandrikov/editshas
made the import of a whole city, but made it very casually: duplicate
streets, unclosed contours of buildings, addresses as names of
Hi,
I'd like to ask to revert the changeset 2452658:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2452658
It has been made by a user mistakingly adding Rio de Janeiro's POIs
somewhere on UK.
Thanks
--
Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr.
Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - uniriotec.br
Arlindo Pereira wrote:
I'd like to ask to revert the changeset 2452658:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2452658
It has been made by a user mistakingly adding Rio de Janeiro's POIs
somewhere on UK.
Done, but seeing as this was node/way creation, it could've just as
easily
Thank you. I'll alert the user.
Cheers,
2009/9/14 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl:
Arlindo Pereira wrote:
I'd like to ask to revert the changeset 2452658:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2452658
It has been made by a user mistakingly adding Rio de Janeiro's POIs
somewhere on UK.
I think I have just screwed up the Eng/Wales border relation around Presteign
where I have tried to make part of it be tagged as a river as well as admin
boundary - by splitting the boundary twice to add a tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.2641lon=-2.9896zoom=14
I am not familiar with
Would somebody run two reverts for me please?
My import failed in changesets 2311851 and 2308610
Nodes were imported for woods polygons but not the ways. fail.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Would somebody run two reverts for me please?
My import failed in changesets 2311851 and 2308610
Nodes were imported for woods polygons but not the ways. fail.
Did you get an error from the server? I also saw this
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ian Deesian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Would somebody run two reverts for me please?
My import failed in changesets 2311851 and 2308610
Nodes were imported for woods polygons but not the
Hi,
Richard Weait wrote:
Would somebody run two reverts for me please?
At it right now...
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 18 Aug 2009, at 20:08, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:48:03 +0300, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/8/18 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:57, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
Could somebody please revert this changeset:
Could somebody please revert this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2168210
The moving of the nodes across the Atlantic is obviously wrong.
Regards Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:16 +0100, an Alice Kaerast wrote:
Is there any way that changesets #1420511 and #1420511 can be
reverted? I would imagine not given that work has continued since
then. Alternatively, how can we remove all the duplicate nodes and
ways over this large area?
I
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657. They seem
to have been buggy (only 3 nodes visible out of many) and whan I did
an update of relations connected to these roads, they was updated with
Thanks for the help
Aun
On 21/05/2009, at 08:12, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657. They seem
to have been buggy (only 3 nodes visible out of many) and whan I did
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657.
If this hasn't been done yet, try investigating the H key in
Potlatch. Reverting individual ways is usually fairly easy.
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
I wrote:
If this hasn't been done yet, try investigating the H key in
Potlatch. Reverting individual ways is usually fairly easy.
Sorry, wrong talk list...
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Can somebody look into reverting way 33136730 and 33136657. They seem
to have been buggy (only 3 nodes visible out of many) and whan I did
an update of relations connected to these roads, they was updated with
the version I had on my computer (no changes should have been done to
the ways).
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
