2011/2/5 :
> For that matter, are different projections used at different zoom levels? At
> the higher zoom levels, since you will likely be viewing only a small
> geographical area at a time, it would make sense to use a projection with a
> minimum of distortion, even for high latitudes, rath
projection.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] South pole, Antarctic boundaries and empty node
From :mailto:osml...@gorm.cc
Date :Sat Feb 05 08:51:19 America/Chicago 2011
Hi
Not quite on topic, but somewhat related:
Has anyone made and published tiles for an azimuthal
Hi
Not quite on topic, but somewhat related:
Has anyone made and published tiles for an azimuthal equidistant or a
similar projection centered on the poles with osm data?
best regards
-gorm
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:12 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Since December 2010 a bug is visible regard
Since December 2010 a bug is visible regarding the south pole (someone
entered national boundaries at the Antarctica and they show up on 0,0
instead of 90,0 in mapnik.
There is also this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1135445055
which is probably not in conjuction with the other p
"It looks like you are trying to create a multipolygon relation. Would you
like some help with that?"
On Nov 24, 2010 2:16 PM, "M∡rtin Koppenhoefer"
wrote:
2010/11/24 Richard Weait :
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Gregory
wrote:
>> Instead of "Sout...
Great idea. We could animate the pape
2010/11/24 Richard Weait :
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Gregory wrote:
>> Instead of "South Pole" at 0,0 can we have something like "You are here" or
>> "You are lost".
>> "Great adventures start here", "Did you mess up coding?".
>> Hmm too many possibilities, maybe we would have to put it
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Gregory wrote:
> Instead of "South Pole" at 0,0 can we have something like "You are here" or
> "You are lost".
> "Great adventures start here", "Did you mess up coding?".
> Hmm too many possibilities, maybe we would have to put it to a wiki vote.
FakeSteveC sugge
Instead of "South Pole" at 0,0 can we have something like "You are here" or
"You are lost".
"Great adventures start here", "Did you mess up coding?".
Hmm too many possibilities, maybe we would have to put it to a wiki vote.
On 23 November 2010 08:52, Ed Loach wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:59 +0100, Rob wrote:
> even more "polution"
>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0.445&lon=-1.674&zoom=10&layers=M
And Jon replied:
> That has a different cause. Someone did upload data putting
> buildings
> here which have since been removed
Except for this way, I think:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:59 +0100, Rob wrote:
> even more "polution"
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0.445&lon=-1.674&zoom=10&layers=M
That has a different cause. Someone did upload data putting buildings
here which have since been removed:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/75383193
Wh
even more "polution"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0.445&lon=-1.674&zoom=10&layers=M
2010/11/15 Toby Murray :
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Nakor wrote:
>> My next question is then: what is the correct place to
>> report it?
>
> Trac. But it has already been reported there:
>
> http://t
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Nakor wrote:
> My next question is then: what is the correct place to
> report it?
Trac. But it has already been reported there:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1327
Toby
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap
On 11/12/2010 4:30 PM, Nakor wrote:
Did the South Pole move?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it
displays "South Pole"
Thanks,
N.
The goal of my original message is to point out a potential problem on
On 15/11/10 16:02, Nakor wrote:
> Sure but how do we get this fixed so Mapnik layer in osm.org does not
> show the South Pole in the wrong place?
Provide a patch for osm2pgsql to make it clip/discard geometries which
go beyond 85 degrees north/south (or whatever the actual limit is).
Tom
--
To
The Mapnik layer cannot show the South Pole at all. The projection
does get cut off at 85 degrees, no mattre what.
You could go and render your own maps with a different projection, but
the Mapnik layer at osm.org probably will keep this way.
Maybe there should be something in osm2pgsql's default.
Sure but how do we get this fixed so Mapnik layer in osm.org does not
show the South Pole in the wrong place?
2010/11/13 Peter:
if(lat> 85)
{
do_not_render();
}
2010/11/13 Nathan Edgars II
Nakor Osm wrote:
Did the South Pole move?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&la
if(lat > 85 || lat < -85)
{
do_not_render();
}
(and yep, something went wrong with my emails...)
2010/11/13 Peter :
> oops, yes...
>
> 2010/11/13 Nathan Edgars II :
>> Did you mean to send this to the list?
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Peter wrote:
>>> Oops, must be:
>>> if(la
Nakor Osm wrote:
>
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/436012592
Remember that the Mercator projection c
OH NO!!! It has started! We're all gonna DIE11!!!
Nakor wrote:
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
> Thanks,
>
> N.
>
>
I guess is created from the position of north pole...
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nakor wrote:
> Did the South Pole move?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
>
> More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
> "South Pole"
>
> Thanks,
>
>
Did the South Pole move?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0&lon=0&zoom=17&layers=M
More seriously there is no data there and I am wondering why it displays
"South Pole"
Thanks,
N.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstre
21 matches
Mail list logo
