--- On Wed, 29/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a
> different kind
> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according
> to a
> different fee system / business modell.
There is a tag for brothel in the system already
Here is the propose page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Love_Hotel
Cheers,
2009/7/29 Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:17:59 +0200, Ulf Lamping
>
> wrote:
> > Joseph Scanlan schrieb:
> >> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:17:59 +0200, Ulf Lamping
wrote:
> Joseph Scanlan schrieb:
>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind
>>> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according to a
>>> different fee sys
Yes, that's right, usually regular couples go there. Should I propose a new
tag?
Cheers,
2009/7/29 Ulf Lamping
> Joseph Scanlan schrieb:
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> >> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind
> >> of object, it is not a
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> You seem to think about an "inofficial brothel", as prostitution is illegal
> in some parts of nevada.
Sorry I wasn't clear. I understand the love motel isn't a brothel. My
point is that in places that disapprove (officially or not) some business
loo
Joseph Scanlan schrieb:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind
>> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according to a
>> different fee system / business modell.
>
> Around here I would not use a separ
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind
> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according to a
> different fee system / business modell.
Around here I would not use a separate tag. No-Tell Motels must show
That's the point. Shouldn't we use another tag to map these kind of hotels?
I imagine a search tool for each type of hotels, without having to guess
about the period or the movies :P
2009/7/29 Joseph Scanlan
> Perhaps an additional tag to show stay duration.
>
>stay=hourly;daily;weekly;m
2009/7/29 Joseph Scanlan :
> Perhaps an additional tag to show stay duration.
>
> stay=hourly;daily;weekly;monthly
>
> Use any that apply. (There's probably a better tag to use than 'stay'.)
>
> We used to have a motel in town that featured "Free XXX Adult Movies" on
> their Marque (just in
Perhaps an additional tag to show stay duration.
stay=hourly;daily;weekly;monthly
Use any that apply. (There's probably a better tag to use than 'stay'.)
We used to have a motel in town that featured "Free XXX Adult Movies" on
their Marque (just in case hourly rates weren't a big enoug
Always on short time basis (1-4h) and always with the "love" factor...
perhaps the portuguese Wikipedia article translated to english [2] would
help on clarifying that.
2:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=pt-BR&sl=pt&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fpt.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMotel
Cheers,
2009/7/29
2009/7/29 Arlindo Pereira :
> Hi there,
>
> here in Brazil, and in most of Latin America as I can see on Wikipedia [1],
> so-called "motels" are short-time hotels or "love hotels", differing from
> the original concept in english (hotel for drivers). Do you think that we
> should tag them different
Hi there,
here in Brazil, and in most of Latin America as I can see on Wikipedia [1],
so-called "motels" are short-time hotels or "love hotels", differing from
the original concept in english (hotel for drivers). Do you think that we
should tag them differently (such as amenity=lovehotel or whatev
13 matches
Mail list logo
