2009/9/29 Joseph Reeves
> Hi Emilie,
>
> Apologies for not replying in French - although I have an interest in
> what you're doing, I don't have the language skills to speak to you
> about it natively.
>
> I'm very pleased to see that the Corine data import is going forward
> and am looking forwa
Hi Emilie,
Apologies for not replying in French - although I have an interest in
what you're doing, I don't have the language skills to speak to you
about it natively.
I'm very pleased to see that the Corine data import is going forward
and am looking forward to seeing the results when it's compl
On 28 Sep 2009, at 10:06 , Ruben Wisniewski wrote:
> I think the user speaks for itself, you can look at the history if you
> want to know where the data came from. But I think there should be a
> tag
> like on the tiger data which indicates if the data was reviewed
> locally,
> to prove it i
I think the user speaks for itself, you can look at the history if you
want to know where the data came from. But I think there should be a tag
like on the tiger data which indicates if the data was reviewed locally,
to prove it is valid.
Regards,
Ruben
Marc Schütz wrote:
>> I am sending a quick
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> It will disappear from there anyway as soon as somebody modifies the way.
>
> Bye
Hi
> Frederik
Yes, I know. And I would say it is normal if the original landuse is
improved by local survey. It is not if the landuse polygon is not
modified
Hi,
Pieren wrote:
> I would like too. But if we move the attribution (which is a legal
> statement we must insert) into the changesets, it disappears in the
> exports and planet dumps.
It will disappear from there anyway as soon as somebody modifies the way.
Bye
Frederik
___
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:03 AM, "Marc Schütz" wrote:
> Shouldn't the attribution (source) go into the changeset? I don't know what
> the current consensus about this is. AFAIK a bot is removing these things
> from the TIGER data in the US right now.
>
> Regards, Marc
I would like too. But if
Hi,
Marc Schütz wrote:
>> I am sending a quick message to mention that the French import of
>> Corine has started. We created an user for the occasion:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CLCF06
>
> Shouldn't the attribution (source) go into the changeset? I don't
> know what the current con
> I am sending a quick message to mention that the French import of Corine
> has started. We created an user for the occasion:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CLCF06
>
> ...
Shouldn't the attribution (source) go into the changeset? I don't know what the
current consensus about this is. AF
Hello,
I am sending a quick message to mention that the French import of Corine
has started. We created an user for the occasion:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CLCF06
The polygons are already starting to appear all over France, since we
are uploading polygons by polygons. The import will tak
10 matches
Mail list logo
