I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
few others in the 1000's have been moved halfway round the planet.
I fixed node 1205, but it's going to be making a mess of the mapnik map.
Is there an easy wa
Dave Stubbs wrote:
>Sent: 06 February 2008 5:58 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] User umehlig and some really nasty edits
>
>I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
>number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-6
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
> number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
> few others in the 1000's have been moved halfway round the planet.
>
> I fixed node 1205, b
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
> > number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
> > few others in the 10
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23 +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
> > > number nodes that have been utte
On Feb 6, 2008 8:39 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23 +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I don't know who/what they are,
;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Stubbs wrote:
> >Sent: 06 February 2008 5:58 PM
> >To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> >Subject: [OSM-talk] User umehlig and some really nasty edits
> >
> >I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
> >numbe
80n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Sent: 06 February 2008 9:12 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder)
>Cc: Dave Stubbs; talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] User umehlig and some really nasty edits
>
>If the server were to provide the original timestamp as an addition
Would a version number be a cleaner solution? I'm always uneasy about
using dates for this purpose.
80n wrote:
> If the server were to provide the original timestamp as an additional
> attribute, and reject if it didn't match on upload, then problems like
> this could be prevented.
>
> It wou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brett Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would a version number be a cleaner solution? I'm always uneasy about
> using dates for this purpose.
If our objects all had version numbers then maybe. They don't (yet).
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dave Stubbs wrote:
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
few others in the 1000's have been moved halfway round the planet.
All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
>Dave
Stubbs
wrote:
>>
I
don't
know
who/what
they
are,
but
there
are
a
large
number
of
low
>>
number
nodes
that
have
been
utterly
destroyed.
Basically
522-603
and
a
>>
few
others
in
the
1000's
have
been
moved
halfway
round
the
planet.
>All
right
I
confe
Hi Chris.
I learnt it quite soon after I uploaded my version of 300. I just
sniffed JOSM but that is not the way ordinary people learn. It
SHOULD (IMHO MUST) be described on the API page.
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave
Stubbs
wrote:
I
don't
know
who/what
they
are,
but
there
are
a
large
On Feb 11, 2008 9:44 AM, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if there is a page anywhere that documents the
> format of JOSM change files?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/JOSM_file_format
On the more general idea of change file formats:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index
On Feb 10, 2008 10:51 PM, Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
> 300 a while ago. But while you are considering some solutions to
> this problem allow me to explain myself. I tried to find out how to
> create and upload os
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:44:21AM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> I don't know if there is a page anywhere that documents the
> format of JOSM change files?
Nothing sophisticated. Everything with a negative id gets created, everything
with an action="modify" attribute is uploaded, and everything with
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2008 10:51 PM, Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
>> 300 a while ago. But while you are considering some solutions t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> > Indeed. I think the problem is that he is reading a page that
> > documents the HTTP API and expecting it to tell him the format
> > of a JOSM change file.
>
> No, I was reading the page
Tom Hughes wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008 10:51 PM, Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
300 a while ago. But while you are considering so
Tom Hughes wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
Indeed. I think the problem is that he is reading a page that
documents the HTTP API and expecting it to tell him the format
of a JOSM change file.
No, I was reading the pa
Hi,
> And I ask: what is the value of the `id' attribute of the object in
> question when the ID hasn't been assigned yet? Today I know the answer
So why not just put it in the Wiki? Every misunderstanding that is
subsequently resolved is a chance to improve our documentation. I've
added a not
Hi,
> Let me repeat onece more:
> * the DTDs say IDs are *required*
True, that should perhaps be changed. Sadly, the only way to do it
100% correct is to create an individual DTD for each of the operations
and we don't want that because it makes the whole thing too
complicated.
> * no paragraph
22 matches
Mail list logo
