On 30/07/2014, Pieren wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
>
>> I'd consider that a useful note, and certainly within the scope of what
>> notes were intended for.
>
> ?!
> "useful" in what ? That the street names are missing in a town ? Then
> create a note for missing a
Þann 30.7.2014 19:50, skrifaði SomeoneElse:
On 30/07/2014 15:08, colliar wrote:
Am 30.07.2014 15:58, schrieb Glenn Plas:
...
So he's asking if you know the names of the missing street.
and closing the note.
Therefor you need to have a login to reopen in order to be able to
comment and it wil
On 30/07/2014 15:08, colliar wrote:
Am 30.07.2014 15:58, schrieb Glenn Plas:
...
So he's asking if you know the names of the missing street.
and closing the note.
Therefor you need to have a login to reopen in order to be able to
comment and it will disappear after one week.
Not the best way
On Jul 29, 2014 3:35 PM, "Jóhannes Birgir Jensson" wrote:
> I reopened it with a comment of my own, I found this approach very
strange because Map Notes are in my mind a to-do list obvious problems that
require surveying on the ground.
Speaking as someone who currently accounts for probably arou
Am 30.07.2014 15:58, schrieb Glenn Plas:
> Akward moment,
>
> I though my French escaped my brain somehow but it didn't.
>
> "so what" (in French Oui. Quels sont-ils ?)
>
> 'Oui, Quels sont-ils?' means: "Yes, which ones are they?" !
>
> So he's asking if you know the names of the missing s
Akward moment,
I though my French escaped my brain somehow but it didn't.
"so what" (in French Oui. Quels sont-ils ?)
'Oui, Quels sont-ils?' means: "Yes, which ones are they?" !
So he's asking if you know the names of the missing street.
Glenn
On 29-07-14 22:32, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson w
Am 30.07.2014 11:05, schrieb Pieren:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, JB wrote:
>> Hey, I think you are loosing the point. It is different to say « Here is a
>> pharmacy missing » (carry an information) than to say « here is the street
>> name missing » (IMO carry no information).
>
> Well, a
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, JB wrote:
> Hey, I think you are loosing the point. It is different to say « Here is a
> pharmacy missing » (carry an information) than to say « here is the street
> name missing » (IMO carry no information).
Well, a note saying "here is THIS street or group of s
I have used http://regio-osm.de/ and would have been glad if it was the
other way round: People pointing out the few places where streets are
missing opposed to knowing, well somewhere in the city there is supposed
to be a street named xyz, but you have no idea where it is. Obviously
here it's
Hey, I think you are loosing the point. It is different to say « Here is
a pharmacy missing » (carry an information) than to say « here is the
street name missing » (IMO carry no information). While I like the first
one (and even prefer it wher the name is added), I don't like the
second, that
create a note for missing addresses, shops, pharmacies, etc. Such
notes do not help contributors because it is so obvious and does not
bring any information or error report helping the others.
Missing POIs are not obvious at all. I can't look at openstreetmap.org
and see "Oh there is a shop or
> "useful" in what ? That the street names are missing in a town ? Then
> create a note for missing addresses, shops, pharmacies, etc. Such
> notes do not help contributors because it is so obvious and does not
> bring any information or error report helping the others. It just a
> bit arrongant o
Hello, good morning there,
Some answers, and yes, I am JBacc1, closer of many notes in France. I
also appreciate that this is (in my memory) the first time some interest
is shown on the note feature (outside perhaps dev, that I do not read
but was pointed to some interesting messages there).
/
Þann 29.7.2014 22:05, skrifaði Andreas Labres:
On 29.07.14 22:32, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
Map Notes are in my mind a to-do list obvious problems that require surveying
on the ground
I disagree with this (principle idea).
I disagree with your disagreement.
But if the names exist and are
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> I'd consider that a useful note, and certainly within the scope of what
> notes were intended for.
?!
"useful" in what ? That the street names are missing in a town ? Then
create a note for missing addresses, shops, pharmacies, etc. Such
not
On 7/29/2014 1:32 PM, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
Well I was surveying some area in France earlier this year and found a
spot with missing street names so I marked it in and a JBacc1 (same
JB?) commented "so what" (in French Oui. Quels sont-ils ?) and
resolved it thus.
I reopened it wit
On 29.07.14 22:32, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> Map Notes are in my mind a to-do list obvious problems that require surveying
> on the ground
I disagree with this (principle idea). Notes were created as an easy means for
non-mappers (or less experienced mappers) to give some kind of hint where
I always thought Notes could work in 2 directions. It's sometimes easier to
create a Note from OsmAND or Vespucci, than to do the mapping right there
and then. Those are the Notes I usually resolve myself, after I come home,
as it's easier to work on the data with JOSM.
They can, of course serve a
The previous discussion about apparent automated Notes spam in various
places about speed limits brought one comment I found interesting, where
JB said "but in France, I have never ever seen anyone comment on someone
else's note".
Well I was surveying some area in France earlier this year and
19 matches
Mail list logo
