Hi all,
I'm trying to get a definative answer for all the tags.
So far so good. :-)
it looks like its unanaimous that the 'canvec:description' tags get removed.
So thats cool, its not that hard to remove those tags. :)
Any comments about the other tags, why they should be removed or kept?
Im sure
>
> Out of the "Buildings and structures" page, yes, there is however
> more useful information in CanVec that I think has a place in OSM
> too, beside the obvious (name, name:fr, etc) on the
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec_OSM_Map_Features#Attributes_common_to_all_entities
> page.
Y
2009/6/20 Ian Dees :
> In my opinion, the only data that should be imported as tags on geographic
> features in the OSM database is the data in the "OSM Tags" column on the
> "Buildings and structures" page. The other columns of data should not be
> included as tags.
Out of the "Buildings and stru
In my opinion, the only data that should be imported as tags on geographic
features in the OSM database is the data in the "OSM Tags" column on the
"Buildings and structures" page. The other columns of data should not be
included as tags.
- The data in the "Canvec Feature" column is a duplicate of
Cool :)
(I cc'd OSGeo & NRCan, so their in the loop too.) Decisions here means a
addition or subtraction of about a Gig or so of data.
So this is why i stopped uploading. Would have been nice to have heard more
voices from the start, lol.. or maybe i wasn't listening .. lol
I'm looking back at
5 matches
Mail list logo
