Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-22 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Ed Loach wrote: When editing, Potlatch no longer shows what relations an existing way is part of. I'm assuming this isn't deliberate. Still trying to track this one down. It works 100% as intended on my local test setup, with the latest svn code and the latest Potlatch (though still running

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-22 Thread Lambertus
A sudden upset stomach caused some delay, but the forum login is working again. Lambertus wrote: marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break the

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread maning sambale
-- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM Subject: [OSM-talk] We're back To: t...@openstreetmap.org ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious

[OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom,

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Avis
Congratulations! Excellent work. I will start uploading my backlog of edits shortly... Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? -- Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 11:18, Ed Avis wrote: Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? Yes, though it is still a different database layout compared to that used by Mapnik. For the time being you can use

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-21 Thread Lambertus
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break the forum authentication for now. I'm working on it. ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse:   http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Just great ! Big thanks to the sysadmin team. A small note : the changesets page says Recently closed

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Steve Hill
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute aren't being updated at the moment - what's the

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Pieren wrote: Another short question : empty changesets are possible ? (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/876923) (I tried to download the xml but no response - I guess it is the server current load). Indeed, there's no prohibition on empty changesets. Specifically,

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Martijn van Exel
Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or something else altogether? martijn van exel -+- mve...@gmail.com -+-

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-21 Thread marcus.wolschon
Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Marcus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Brett Henderson
Shaun McDonald wrote: On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Loach
Richard wrote: Specifically, Potlatch at present creates a new changeset when you open it, so if you don't actually make any edits then an empty changeset will result. Talking of Potlatch, should I open a trac ticket for the following? An example way:

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Andy Allan
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org wrote: The changeset stuff looks really good, and I note the welcome addition of a comment field.  Is there any way of getting an RSS feed (or similar) of recent changesets and their comments within a specific bounding box? That'd

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Martijn van Exel wrote: Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or something else altogether? Load-related. I know of two issues

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Ed Loach
Richard wrote: I know of two issues with Potlatch 0.11 at the moment. One is relation handling (actually I see Ed's just posted about that) - not clear yet whether this is Potlatch-specific. JOSM showed the relation that the way was part of, but there seems to be a different relation issue

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Gregory Williams
-Original Message- From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ed Loach Sent: 21 April 2009 14:28 To: 'Richard Fairhurst'; talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back Richard wrote: I know of two issues with Potlatch

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Nop
Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 21 Apr 2009, at 18:32, Nop wrote: Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? This problem was found and sorted in the past few hours. Can you please

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Grant Slater
check again and report. / Grant Nop wrote: Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? bye Nop

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Rolf Bode-Meyer
2009/4/21 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk: The tag values shown in the non-history version of the call are only from the first version, which was what I was attempting to fix the value for (I meant to type National cycle Network National Route 43, not ...4). Hm, I

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Nop
Grant Slater schrieb: check again and report. Appears to be fixed. bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Mike Harris
:44 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] We're back ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-21 Thread Gregory Williams
-Original Message- From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Bode-Meyer Sent: 21 April 2009 19:09 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back 2009/4/21 Gregory Williams gregory.willi