Re: [OSM-talk] boundaries vs. is_in vs. relations

Lester Caine schrieb: > is_in being populated and stored is always going to be quicker to search than > trying to process a multitude of complex boundaries to find out if a node is > inside or outside the enclosed area? More so on larger boundaries, but non > the > less a university campus or h

Re: [OSM-talk] boundaries vs. is_in vs. relations

Karl Newman wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 10:56 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Robin Paulson wrote: > > one of the tag proposals i've been working on recently has got me > > thinking about tagging composite items, and the best way to do it. >

Re: [OSM-talk] boundaries vs. is_in vs. relations

On Jan 29, 2008 10:56 AM, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robin Paulson wrote: > > one of the tag proposals i've been working on recently has got me > > thinking about tagging composite items, and the best way to do it. > > > > in the case of a large site, say a hospital, university or c

Re: [OSM-talk] boundaries vs. is_in vs. relations

Robin Paulson wrote: > one of the tag proposals i've been working on recently has got me > thinking about tagging composite items, and the best way to do it. > > in the case of a large site, say a hospital, university or coalmine, > is there any consensus on how to collectively tag all the buildin

[OSM-talk] boundaries vs. is_in vs. relations

one of the tag proposals i've been working on recently has got me thinking about tagging composite items, and the best way to do it. in the case of a large site, say a hospital, university or coalmine, is there any consensus on how to collectively tag all the buildings, sports fields, car parks, e