On 23 Oct 2008, at 22:17, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bob Jonkman wrote:
>> In my locality there is a gas station (petrol station) which has
>> the name
>> "Elmira Service Centre", is it owned and operated by Norm
>> Stanaitis, and
>> it has a prominent banner for "UPI" brand gasoline, rec
Hi,
Bob Jonkman wrote:
> In my locality there is a gas station (petrol station) which has the name
> "Elmira Service Centre", is it owned and operated by Norm Stanaitis, and
> it has a prominent banner for "UPI" brand gasoline, recently switched from
> "Pioneer" brand gasoline. The locals all r
Bob Jonkman schrieb:
In my locality there is a gas station (petrol station) which has the name
"Elmira Service Centre", is it owned and operated by Norm Stanaitis, and
it has a prominent banner for "UPI" brand gasoline, recently switched from
"Pioneer" brand gasoline. The locals all refer to th
In my locality there is a gas station (petrol station) which has the name
"Elmira Service Centre", is it owned and operated by Norm Stanaitis, and
it has a prominent banner for "UPI" brand gasoline, recently switched from
"Pioneer" brand gasoline. The locals all refer to this station as
"Stanai
On 23/10/2008 12:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I notice there is increasing use of a tag brand=... for things like
>> shops, fuel, banks, atms etc. This seems like a good idea to me, as the
>> name of something ("Murkets Corner f
On 23/10/08 12:16, Skywave wrote:
> I have been using myself the operator=tag for this kind of stuff. Any
> opinion if brand= is more suitable than operator+.
I've been using operator=... for things like ATMs.
Rory
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstree
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Hendrik T. Voelker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skywave wrote:
>> I have been using myself the operator=tag for this kind of stuff. Any
>> opinion if brand= is more suitable than operator+.
>
> Even though the differentiation might be a thin line, but they are two
Skywave wrote:
> I have been using myself the operator=tag for this kind of stuff. Any
> opinion if brand= is more suitable than operator+.
Even though the differentiation might be a thin line, but they are two
different things. Just consider franchise concepts
The operator of a patrol station i
On 23 Oct 2008, at 12:18, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
I notice there is increasing use of a tag brand=... for things like
shops, fuel, banks, atms etc. This seems like a good idea to me, as
the
name of something ("Murkets Corne
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:05 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice there is increasing use of a tag brand=... for things like
> shops, fuel, banks, atms etc. This seems like a good idea to me, as the
> name of something ("Murkets Corner filling station") can be different
> from its
I have been using myself the operator=tag for this kind of stuff. Any
opinion if brand= is more suitable than operator+.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:05 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I notice there is increasing use of a tag brand=... for things like
> shops, fuel, banks, atms etc. This
I notice there is increasing use of a tag brand=... for things like
shops, fuel, banks, atms etc. This seems like a good idea to me, as the
name of something ("Murkets Corner filling station") can be different
from its branding ("Shell"). Often you'd use them interchangeable
("Starbucks" doesn'
12 matches
Mail list logo
