ns Lambert Carsten
Verzonden: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:51 PM
Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] clean gpx tracks
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:53:00 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
wrote:
> It is not intended to "protect" OSM against infringement at all. It&#
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:53:00 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> It is not intended to "protect" OSM against infringement at all. It's there
> as a statement about the ethos of the project that you don't upload data
> from copyright sources. Of course we all know it's possible to c
Lambert Carsten wrote:
>Sent: 25 September 2008 5:36 PM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] clean gpx tracks
>
>On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:01:36 Karl wrote:
>
>> The GPX tracks are intended to show the basis for the ways and other data
>> that
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:01:36 Karl wrote:
> The GPX tracks are intended to show the basis for the ways and other data
> that is in the database, so I think one motivation for timestamps hearkens
> back to a desire to "show your work" to defend the source of OSM data
> against potential fu
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The GPX tracks are intended to show the basis for the ways and other data
> that is in the database, so I think one motivation for timestamps hearkens
> back to a desire to "show your work" to defend the source of OSM data
>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lambert Carsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:21:59 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> > Lambert Carsten wrote:
> > > This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a
> > > privacy issue here there are clearly those that
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:21:59 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Lambert Carsten wrote:
> > This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a
> > privacy issue here there are clearly those that do
>
> Just don't set your track as public - then the timestamps won't be exposed.
I
Lambert Carsten wrote:
> This decision needs more thought. Although I personally don't have a privacy
> issue here there are clearly those that do
Just don't set your track as public - then the timestamps won't be exposed.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mai
Hi,
Thanks for the tips pointing to Viking! I am just starting to get to grips
with the way it works, but it's definitely usefull. And probably for other
things I still have to discover as of yet.
I am still curious to know why these time stamps are necessary. It seems an
arbitrary decision b
Lambert Carsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is also a privacy advantage not uploading the unnecessary time
> stamps. I am sure there are many that hesitate to upload tracks for
> privacy reasons.
A while ago I wrote a small shell script which did the following things:
- It removes trackpoin
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Lambert Carsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upload a couple of gpx tracks that I had cleaned up with Josm.
> They
> were refused with a message that seems to suggest thy are missing time
> stamps
> (possibly missing altitude).
>
> Why does opens
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Lambert Carsten wrote:
> Maybe someone can point me to some editor with which I can easily clean up
> the
> tracks without clearing out the time stamps (personally I don't have a
> problem uploading that info).
I use viking (http://sourceforge.net/proj
Hi,
I tried to upload a couple of gpx tracks that I had cleaned up with Josm. They
were refused with a message that seems to suggest thy are missing time stamps
(possibly missing altitude).
Why does openstreetmap want timestamps? There is no reason for this.
I want to clean up my tracks to prev
13 matches
Mail list logo
