i found source-date,
but if i can not on the ground verifies i do not think i should change, they
did not like non gofers
waking around.
>Tuesday, June 9, 2020 5:14 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>
>
>
>Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
>>just to be safe i
> it is useful to add something like
> note=edited based on survey
or survey:date=
in the hope than one day, editor 'll warn a mapper
if his source is older than the previous one.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreet
And there is no need to be comprehensive. Map it as you you, little
by little.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 12:15 Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
>
> just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours
Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
> just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by
> public transportation.
>
> the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam,
> which was not there in 1969
>
> when we went down the rive
On 9/6/20 8:26 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2
hours by public transportation.
the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the
dam, which was not there in 1969
when we went down the river in cement tubs
just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by
public transportation.
the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam,
which was not there in 1969
when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all
marked unma
6 matches
Mail list logo
