Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-13 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 08:44:59 -0600 Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 04:33:57 -0600 > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:3

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 04:33:57 -0600 > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500 > > > Andrew Guertin wrote: > > > > > > > So the question is, sho

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-11 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 04:33:57 -0600 Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500 > > Andrew Guertin wrote: > > > > > So the question is, should uses of highway=residential_link be > > > edited away, should they be left

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-11 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500 > Andrew Guertin wrote: > > > So the question is, should uses of highway=residential_link be edited > > away, should they be left as-is (unless a different highway type is > > clearly better), or should

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-10 Thread Bryan Housel
Makes sense to me for little connecting ways between `highway=residential` I just added a `highway=residential_link` here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379558356#map=19/40.68813/-74.38970 Thanks, Bryan > On Nov 10, 20

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-10 Thread Lester Caine
On 10/11/15 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2015-11-10 9:36 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny >: > > In theory, it is possible that former motorway/.../tertiary with slip > roads/ramps was converted to residential road, without changing road > infrastructure

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-11-10 9:36 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > In theory, it is possible that former motorway/.../tertiary with slip > roads/ramps was converted to residential road, without changing road > infrastructure and traffic is still grade-separated. > sounds not very likely. At the point where a moto

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-10 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:36:28 -0500 Andrew Guertin wrote: > So the question is, should uses of highway=residential_link be edited > away, should they be left as-is (unless a different highway type is > clearly better), or should the tag be approved and documented? Can somebody give examples of l

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-09 Thread Andrew Guertin
Oops, this was supposed to go to tagging... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] highway=residential_link

2015-11-09 Thread Andrew Guertin
A question recently came up as to whether highway=residential_link is a meaningful tag or whether uses of it should be changed to some other value (like highway=residential or highway=service). This tag has no description in the wiki, though it is analogous to the other highway=*_link types de