Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-24 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Right now when you click on other in this menu, the other tag that is considered principal by iD gets silently removed (e.g. if you click on a highway on other, the highway-tag is removed). Yeah, this was/is a

[OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I just discovered that iD presumes that some tags are exclusive, e.g. you can't add (at least not via preset) on the same way (line) more than one of these tags: highway, railway, power but afaik it is common practice to use railway=tram on the same way as highway=* (in certain circumstances).

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Kathleen Danielson
Hi Martin-- if I'm understanding you correctly, I actually took out a bug about this, and got a response. Looks like this is a known issue-- you can find it here: https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1408 On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I just discovered that iD presumes that some tags are exclusive, e.g. you can't add (at least not via preset) on the same way (line) more than one of these tags: highway, railway, power but afaik it is common

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 23.05.2013 15:54, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I just discovered that iD presumes that some tags are exclusive, e.g. you can't add (at least not via preset) on the same way

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread John F. Eldredge
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: I just discovered that iD presumes that some tags are exclusive, e.g. you can't add (at least not via preset) on the same way (line) more than one of these tags:

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote: So, you are saying that if the tram tracks are located in the highway, but off-center, then the map should not reflect the ground truth? I have seen numerous streets where there are tram tracks in both directions, and

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/5/23 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:30 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote: So, you are saying that if the tram tracks are located in the highway, but off-center, then the map should not reflect the ground truth? I have seen numerous streets where

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 23.05.2013 15:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Right now when you click on other in this menu, the other tag that is considered principal by iD gets silently removed (e.g. if you click on a highway on other, the highway-tag is removed). The idea that of all the tags an object has, one

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Martin Koppenhöfer
Am 23/mag/2013 um 23:17 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: I think it is a legitimate design decision for an editor to not allow its users to create such objects, as long as care is taken that the editor does not silently alter the definitions of such objects that already exist.

Re: [OSM-talk] iD, exclusive use of tags

2013-05-23 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 24.05.2013 00:40, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote: In other cases there should be different objects for the same place, and it might make sense to create an relation to avoid duplication of geometry, e.g. if a user attempts to add a shop tag to a building, Objects with both shop and building