Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-13 Thread Gervase Markham
Ed Loach wrote: > At a risk of re-opening a discussion, what is the unresolved issue > of handedness? Surely if you can have oneway=yes in the direction of > the arrows and oneway=-1 for oneway in the opposite direction of the > arrows, then left and right can also be defined relative to the > dire

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-13 Thread Philip Homburg
In your letter dated Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:00:39 +0100 you wrote: >On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> LeedsTracker wrote: >>> As Shaun says, the unresolved issue of lane handed-ness seems to be >>> blocking this lane issue. >> >> This is anothe occasion whe

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-13 Thread Andy Allan
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LeedsTracker wrote: >> As Shaun says, the unresolved issue of lane handed-ness seems to be >> blocking this lane issue. > > This is anothe occasion where a generic :left/:right proposal would be > useful... Yeah, not so

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-12 Thread Karl Newman
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > graham wrote: > > - Say I have a bus lane (or cycle lane) running along one side of a > > two-way road (the most common situation where I am). Just attaching a > > 'left' tag to it makes it dependent on nobody ever reve

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-12 Thread Gervase Markham
graham wrote: > - Say I have a bus lane (or cycle lane) running along one side of a > two-way road (the most common situation where I am). Just attaching a > 'left' tag to it makes it dependent on nobody ever reversing the > arbitrary direction attached to the way. No, it doesn't, because ed

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-12 Thread graham
Gervase Markham wrote: > LeedsTracker wrote: >> As Shaun says, the unresolved issue of lane handed-ness seems to be >> blocking this lane issue. > > This is anothe occasion where a generic :left/:right proposal would be > useful... > I had missed that thread till now. But it doesn't seem to have

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-12 Thread Ed Loach
Gerv wrote: > LeedsTracker wrote: > > As Shaun says, the unresolved issue of lane handed-ness seems > to be > > blocking this lane issue. > > This is anothe occasion where a generic :left/:right proposal > would be > useful... > > At a risk of re-opening a discussion, what is the unresolv

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-12 Thread Gervase Markham
LeedsTracker wrote: > As Shaun says, the unresolved issue of lane handed-ness seems to be > blocking this lane issue. This is anothe occasion where a generic :left/:right proposal would be useful... Gerv ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-11 Thread LeedsTracker
2008/10/11 Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 11 Oct 2008, at 18:20, graham wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I want to start adding bus lanes and cycle lanes. Lots of them only >> run >> on one side of the road. I'm not clear from the wiki how to do this; >> is >> there a good reference page I've miss

Re: [OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-11 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 11 Oct 2008, at 18:20, graham wrote: > Hi, > > I want to start adding bus lanes and cycle lanes. Lots of them only > run > on one side of the road. I'm not clear from the wiki how to do this; > is > there a good reference page I've missed? Or a clear example? > cycleway=lane is for cycle

[OSM-talk] lanes

2008-10-11 Thread graham
Hi, I want to start adding bus lanes and cycle lanes. Lots of them only run on one side of the road. I'm not clear from the wiki how to do this; is there a good reference page I've missed? Or a clear example? Thanks marinheiro ___ talk mailing list t