Re: [OSM-talk] microsoft/BuildingFootprints

I think the guidelines cover it nicely. I'll sprinkle a few pointers around. I've found changeset comments don't work terribly well with HOT mappers. By the time I stumble across a problem it's a year or more later and they last mapped 9 months ago. In theory they do have a validation process bu

Re: [OSM-talk] microsoft/BuildingFootprints

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines So they need either actual human review or going through that process. If buildings are being duplicated on large scale than likely neither was followed. I would write changeset comment on their edit asking to fix that. In worse cases - rever

Re: [OSM-talk] microsoft/BuildingFootprints

On 16.06.24 08:04, Martin Trautmann via talk wrote: > On 14.06.24 03:27, John Whelan wrote: >> I'm seeing earlier buildings being duplicated by these in Uganda by >> at least one HOT project. >> >> Do we have a formal protocol on how these should be "imported"? > > Besser die Finger davon lassen un

Re: [OSM-talk] microsoft/BuildingFootprints

On 14.06.24 03:27, John Whelan wrote: > I'm seeing earlier buildings being duplicated by these in Uganda by at > least one HOT project. > > Do we have a formal protocol on how these should be "imported"? Besser die Finger davon lassen und nur berichten - das passiert gerade weltweit https://comm

[OSM-talk] microsoft/BuildingFootprints

I'm seeing earlier buildings being duplicated by these in Uganda by at least one HOT project. Do we have a formal protocol on how these should be "imported"? Thanks John -- Sent from Postbox ___ talk mailing list talk@ope