Re: [OSM-talk] node vs. area for amenities in wiki templates

2009-01-25 Thread Frankie Roberto
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > It's now much easier to get the outline of a building e.g. from Yahoo. > Also in densely mapped areas people looking for things to do, as the > basic things like streets and such are just complete. Yup. I'm slowly mapping Manchester's shops

Re: [OSM-talk] node vs. area for amenities in wiki templates

2009-01-23 Thread Ulf Lamping
Tobias Knerr schrieb: > Map Features as well as the info boxes on the individual pages list many > "building" amenities (cafe, cinema...) and other usually area-like > amenities (grave_yard) as node features, while others (brothel, > crematorium...) allow for node or area representation. In some ca

Re: [OSM-talk] node vs. area for amenities in wiki templates

2009-01-23 Thread Matthias Julius
Tobias Knerr writes: > Map Features as well as the info boxes on the individual pages list many > "building" amenities (cafe, cinema...) and other usually area-like > amenities (grave_yard) as node features, while others (brothel, > crematorium...) allow for node or area representation. In some c

[OSM-talk] node vs. area for amenities in wiki templates

2009-01-23 Thread Tobias Knerr
Map Features as well as the info boxes on the individual pages list many "building" amenities (cafe, cinema...) and other usually area-like amenities (grave_yard) as node features, while others (brothel, crematorium...) allow for node or area representation. In some cases, areas are listed as possi