Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-03 Thread Steve Chilton
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:00 +, Kevin Peat wrote: It's two thingsthe county boundary shouldn't go up rivers in the first place but also the part of the boundary that follows

[OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Kevin Peat
I made some changes a couple of weeks ago to the banks of the River Dart through Totnes http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.42863lon=-3.67974zoom=15layers=B000FFF Obviously those changes have been picked up as the county boundary is rendering along the updated river bank but the actual river

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Thomas Wood
I believe that there's some boundary rendering bugs that are yet to be fixed in mapnik, I've not seen this one before. As a side issue, does the county boundary really go up the river like that or just cut across the mouth? I think we need to review this. I recall talking to steve8 who did the

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Aun Johnsen (via Webmail)
Maybe the coastal part of the boundary should follow the baseline as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maritime_borders The base line is the maritime border closest to the coast, and will probably not be rendered on most maps. --[] On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:22:34 +, Thomas Wood

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Thomas Wood
The reason it is being rendered is because the coastline is included in the boundary relation, not (afaik) any tagging on the coastline and/or overlapping boundary ways. 2009/3/2 Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org: Maybe the coastal part of the boundary should follow the baseline

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Kevin Peat
It's two thingsthe county boundary shouldn't go up rivers in the first place but also the part of the boundary that follows the coast would be better not being rendered. It seems to me that it must be included in a relation so that the county is an area but would be better not being

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Jon Burgess
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 13:00 +, Kevin Peat wrote: It's two thingsthe county boundary shouldn't go up rivers in the first place but also the part of the boundary that follows the coast would be better not being rendered. It seems to me that it must be included in a relation so that

Re: [OSM-talk] odd rendering + county boundaries

2009-03-02 Thread Kevin Peat
Thanks Jon, that's great. Kevin Jon Burgess wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 10:51 +, Kevin Peat wrote: I made some changes a couple of weeks ago to the banks of the River Dart through Totnes http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.42863lon=-3.67974zoom=15layers=B000FFF Obviously those