On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> Yeah, the unfortunate thing here is that this import probably brought in a
> few hundred to a few thousand of these place=island POIs, and I would hazard
> a guess that a large (huge?) portion of them don't have the physical island
> bound
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
> Interesting issue. The techy in me thinks that tagging the island (tag
> the way) rather than a point may help, since that allows data
> consumers (e.g. renderers) to calculate the size of the island (and
> even, perhaps in future, the longest
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> I've noticed that there's a GNIS import going on in the USA recently, and
> one of the types of POIs being imported are islands, which are tagged
> place=island. Of course, the GNIS database contains some very tiny islands,
> but Mapnik ren
Ted Mielczarek wrote:
> I've noticed that there's a GNIS import going on in the USA recently,
> and one of the types of POIs being imported are islands, which are
> tagged place=island. Of course, the GNIS database contains some very
> tiny islands, but Mapnik renders place=island up to z10. For ex
I've noticed that there's a GNIS import going on in the USA recently, and
one of the types of POIs being imported are islands, which are tagged
place=island. Of course, the GNIS database contains some very tiny islands,
but Mapnik renders place=island up to z10. For example:
http://www.openstreetma
5 matches
Mail list logo
