there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is
removed map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there
is nothing left on ground
*I think* it should be deleted in one changeset. Next year they could
2009/12/18 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
*but* i think this is nothing that we should do -- instead we should go
in conversation with the original author.
Flickr guys wished for 4D tagging, for things like photos taken at
burning man so you can geo-position them on the relevent map data
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/12/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
Isn't that like photos, they can prevent your from
On Friday 18 Dec 2009 2:27:42 pm Frederik Ramm wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
where is china?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Isn't that like photos, they can prevent your from creating the photo
(in some cases like events) but once it exists they have no rights to
make you delete it or have any rights over the image itself.
Burning Man sure *try* to regulate the publication of photos (they
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
We map what is on ground ( with some exceptions like boundaries)
And powerlines, and opening hours, and bus/tram/bike routes, and
proposed/planned/demolished buildings/roads, and ski runs, and culturally
interesting
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man policy
I'm definitely intrigued by this.
I thought they were all peace love!
Do you have a link to this policy?
Ta
Dave F.
___
talk
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man policy
I'm definitely intrigued by this.
I thought they were all peace love!
Do you have a link to this policy?
I explained in my
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:57 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no mapping
policy - do we care?
you have spent to much time on mapping. ;-)
no
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:42 , Peter Körner wrote:
there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is
removed map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there
is nothing left on ground
*I think* it should be
Found by slashme today in the Nevada saltpans, but apparently been there over
one year
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/slashme/diary/8968
all of these changesets
367363
266357
272488
293410
302378
621338
187907
324014
365985
___
talk mailing list
It's the Burning Man Festival and it was recently a Featured Image on
the wiki.
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_Images/Jul-Sep_2009#Week_36)
Kevin
On 12/17/2009 2:30 PM, Liz wrote:
Found by slashme today in the Nevada saltpans, but apparently been there over
one year
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as
alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from maps.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Kevin Samples ksamp...@uga.edu wrote:
It's the Burning Man Festival and it was recently a Featured Image on
the wiki.
2009/12/18 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as
alternative it must be at least tagged different to disappear from maps.
This was discussed a while back, OSM isn't about the here and now
there is some historical information
2009/12/18 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
As I was considering doing a similar thing for Glastonbury, I was
wondering what the consensus on mapping temporary (but regular) structures?
Most people seem to tag it as if it exists all the time, I think in
the case of burning man, it tends to shift
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Hi Apollinaris
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then.
Why?
We map what is on ground ( with some exceptions like boundaries)
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man
17 matches
Mail list logo
