On 7/15/08, Dermot McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks perfect. In practice, you'll probably find it difficult to
> map a bog as a whole, rather it's the big empty brown bit that you'll
> generally end up mapping.
Agreed.
> It certainly is. In traditional use, cuboid sections of pea
2008/7/15 Tim Waters (chippy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is this:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Surface_Mining
>
> But I don't think it covers the "bog" as a whole. Perhaps a big
> polygon natural=lowland_bog and within that, areas of
> landuse=surface_mining with
On 7/15/08, Dermot McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To expand on this - because it's something I've wondered about myself
> - when tagging as seen on-the-ground, there's a big difference between
> a bog being used commercially and a normal, untouched bog. The
> commercially-worked ones have
2008/7/15 Tim Waters (chippy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> as some of us have been out mapping the Irish countryside, we've come
> across peat bogs. Lowland peat bogs mainly, often being used for turf
> extraction (for fuel, or peat for garden centres etc).
>
> Anyone mapped these already? What t
Hi,
as some of us have been out mapping the Irish countryside, we've come
across peat bogs. Lowland peat bogs mainly, often being used for turf
extraction (for fuel, or peat for garden centres etc).
Anyone mapped these already? What tags do you use? It's certainly
natural, sometimes protected, an
5 matches
Mail list logo
