Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 44, Issue 6

2008-04-07 Thread Robin Paulson
2008/4/3 David Ebling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > True, I acknowledge that, but requiring two seperate > attributions for OSM data is going to be confusing to > people who use the data. So far we have managed to get > by on just one attribution. > .. > > It changes the attribution which

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 44, Issue 6

2008-04-02 Thread David Ebling
> well, the attribution they want is so close to that >demanded by > cc-by-sa as to have no real-world difference >>whenever we display NZ we would have to display "crown >>copyright" somewhere totally undermines the purpose of >not necessarily - the settled upon option appears to >be a link on