Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread David Fawcett
Kind of like the nutrition facts labels on food in the US... On Aug 10, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Stefan de Konink wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, David Ellams wrote: > >> I can't take credit for the suggestion, as I think this was Richard F's >> idea (I knew I'd seen it somewhere: is this fair attribu

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread John Smith
On 10 August 2010 23:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > This also gives the advice, consistent with our current licence and with > ODbL, that "where data from a national mapping agency or other major source > has been included in OpenStreetMap, it may be reasonable to credit them by > directly reprodu

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread Richard Fairhurst
John Smith wrote: > No idea about printed maps, but several sites recently only linked > to an attribute page on their site, rather than displaying it on top > of the map, so maybe having a small lookup table of major > contributors that can be linked to would be suitable? We do. :) www.openst

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread Stefan de Konink
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, David Ellams wrote: I can't take credit for the suggestion, as I think this was Richard F's idea (I knew I'd seen it somewhere: is this fair attribution? ). Maybe, for an online map (such as osm.org), a more prominent link to OSM's contributors page would be sufficient (agai

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread John Smith
On 10 August 2010 22:52, David Ellams wrote: > I can't take credit for the suggestion, as I think this was Richard F's > idea (I knew I'd seen it somewhere: is this fair attribution? ). > Maybe, for an online map (such as osm.org), a more prominent link to > OSM's contributors page would be suffic

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread David Ellams
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:20 +1000, "John Smith" wrote: > I've only seen it suggested in the past about how crediting every > single contributor would be pages long, your suggestion is a good > idea, however I'm left wondering if this would make things open to > abuse, how many times would something

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread John Smith
On 10 August 2010 18:14, David Ellams wrote: > I'm not the first to say this, but is the problem not (whichever BY-SA > licence we use) that we are suggesting to people that attributing the > project is enough (rather than, say, giving the most major contributors > to the map area individual attri

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 72, Issue 43

2010-08-10 Thread David Ellams
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:06:00 +0100, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why don't you try this. Import some Ordnance Survey Street View data > into > OSM, then render it as a Produced Work with the ODbL required > attribution: > > "Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available he