On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy answered that in the message you are replying to, but you edited
his answer out.
D'oh. Sorry about that. :-(
- Rob.
___
legal-talk mailing list
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an intended side effect of the license to discourage
internet-based distribution of derivative dbs?
I wouldn't have thought so. :-)
My suggestion would be
that recovering reasonable production cost should also be
Hi,
Andy Allan wrote:
OSM data is large and growing
quickly, and bandwidth isn't free, certainly not at this scale.
Good point, should be fixed.
I guess the phrase came in because people had in mind the sometimes
frivolous use of freedom-of-information-act liberty to charge for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Myers wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it an intended side effect of the license to discourage
internet-based distribution of derivative dbs?
I wouldn't have thought so. :-)
My suggestion
4 matches
Mail list logo
