On 16/08/15 16:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
> One of the reasons why I asked is that OSRM recently was packaged for
> Debian [1], which I am hoping will help with working towards making it
> easier to setup and run.
I've dropped back to suse 13.1 again just to get something working, but
even that
On 16/08/15 12:52, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 16/08/15 12:16, Christopher Baines wrote:
The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
maintained, what are the preferred alternatives? I'm actually not happy
with the way OSRM has moved and there does not seem to be a '
On 16/08/2015 01:46, Paul Norman wrote:
... The problem with Tilemill is that is is abandoned, and includes
in-program text editing, which adds significant complexity to the
codebase, and this text editing does not function with large complex
styles.
FWIW I've always used TileMill with an e
On 16/08/15 12:16, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> > The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
>> > maintained, what are the preferred alternatives? I'm actually not happy
>> > with the way OSRM has moved and there does not seem to be a 'standard'
>> > for the support structure?
On 15/08/15 16:14, Lester Caine wrote:
> Not getting much help on the GB list so I thought I'd widen the
> question. A couple of years back I had my own server setup working with
> a base of OSRM and routing covering the UK. While the map server is
> still working, routing has packed up and some of
On 16/08/15 01:46, Paul Norman wrote:
> On 8/15/2015 2:09 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>> The simple answer seems to be that there is no standard when it comes to
>> mapping applications and everybody creates their own personal special
>> such as kosmtik rather than working with established standards:(
On 8/15/2015 2:09 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
The simple answer seems to be that there is no standard when it comes to
mapping applications and everybody creates their own personal special
such as kosmtik rather than working with established standards:(
Kosmtik is a standard. But it's a development t
On 15/08/15 20:57, Paul Norman wrote:
>> The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
>> maintained, what are the preferred alternatives?
> Kosmtik is the preferred alternative to Tilemill, but both of these are
> style design programs, not programs for serving tiles to others. I
On 8/15/2015 8:14 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Not getting much help on the GB list so I thought I'd widen the
question. A couple of years back I had my own server setup working with
a base of OSRM and routing covering the UK. While the map server is
still working, routing has packed up and some of th
On 15/08/15 18:18, nebulon42 wrote:
> I'm not sure how TileMill fits within your rendering stack here. Do you
> mean Mapnik?
tilemill allows me to serve tiles and play with the tile sheets and I
have it working via nginx as well.
> If you talk about carto-based style development the best alternati
I'm not sure how TileMill fits within your rendering stack here. Do you
mean Mapnik?
If you talk about carto-based style development the best alternative for
TileMill right now is Kosmtik (https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik),
which is developed and maintained by Yohan Boniface. Some if not all
On 15 August 2015 at 17:14, Lester Caine wrote:
> The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
> maintained, what are the preferred alternatives?
Depending on what you need exactly, Kosmtik might be an alternative:
https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
-- Matthijs
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
