Re: [OSM-talk] Microsoft Buildings vs. OpenStreetMap visualization

2019-08-05 Thread Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk
As far as I know, the "Bing Only" layer in the comparison tool represents the vector data that Microsoft has made available here: https://github.com/Microsoft/USBuildingFootprints My experience has been that about 50% of the Bing buildings are rotated to an incorrect orientation. In other rare

Re: [OSM-talk] Microsoft Buildings vs. OpenStreetMap visualization

2019-08-05 Thread Dave F via talk
Hi Is the 'Bing only' vector? On 02/08/2019 12:24, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote: Hi, Here's a demo by azavea showing how 125 Million AI-mapped buildings relate to 33 Million buildings currently in OpenStreetMap in the same region. https://demos.azavea.com/building-footprint-comparison

Re: [OSM-talk] Microsoft Buildings vs. OpenStreetMap visualization

2019-08-03 Thread Pierre Béland via talk
While you observe quality problems with imports,  you can contribute to better document these problems  with samples of buildings ( list of osm_id  and brief description of observations ).   Pierre Le vendredi 2 août 2019 23 h 34 min 17 s UTC−4, AntiCompositeNumber a écrit : In my

Re: [OSM-talk] Microsoft Buildings vs. OpenStreetMap visualization

2019-08-02 Thread AntiCompositeNumber
In my area, it also appears that the detection rate is fairly good. In my brief look through I found one building where there is no building and a few buildings that the AI did not find. The rotation issue was fairly common as well as a general offset from the imagery (This may be on the Mapbox sid

Re: [OSM-talk] Microsoft Buildings vs. OpenStreetMap visualization

2019-08-02 Thread Jmapb
On 8/2/2019 7:24 AM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski wrote: Here's a demo by azavea showing how 125 Million AI-mapped buildings relate to 33 Million buildings currently in OpenStreetMap in the same region. https://demos.azavea.com/building-footprint-comparison/#4.4/38.67/-93.93 Thanks, this is