Hi,
And I ask: what is the value of the `id' attribute of the object in
question when the ID hasn't been assigned yet? Today I know the answer
So why not just put it in the Wiki? Every misunderstanding that is
subsequently resolved is a chance to improve our documentation. I've
added a note
Hi,
Let me repeat onece more:
* the DTDs say IDs are *required*
True, that should perhaps be changed. Sadly, the only way to do it
100% correct is to create an individual DTD for each of the operations
and we don't want that because it makes the whole thing too
complicated.
* no paragraph or
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
Indeed. I think the problem is that he is reading a page that
documents the HTTP API and expecting it to tell him the format
of a JOSM change file.
No, I was reading the page about HTTP
Tom Hughes wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008 10:51 PM, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
300 a while ago. But while you are considering some
Tom Hughes wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
Indeed. I think the problem is that he is reading a page that
documents the HTTP API and expecting it to tell him the format
of a JOSM change file.
No, I was reading the page
On Feb 11, 2008 9:44 AM, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if there is a page anywhere that documents the
format of JOSM change files?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/JOSM_file_format
On the more general idea of change file formats:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:44:21AM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
I don't know if there is a page anywhere that documents the
format of JOSM change files?
Nothing sophisticated. Everything with a negative id gets created, everything
with an action=modify attribute is uploaded, and everything with an
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008 10:51 PM, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right I confess. I have done something like that to the node
300 a while ago. But while you are considering some solutions to
this
Hi Chris.
I learnt it quite soon after I uploaded my version of 300. I just
sniffed JOSM but that is not the way ordinary people learn. It
SHOULD (IMHO MUST) be described on the API page.
Chris Hill wrote:
Dave
Stubbs
wrote:
I
don't
know
who/what
they
are,
but
there
are
a
Would a version number be a cleaner solution? I'm always uneasy about
using dates for this purpose.
80n wrote:
If the server were to provide the original timestamp as an additional
attribute, and reject if it didn't match on upload, then problems like
this could be prevented.
It would
Dave Stubbs wrote:
Sent: 06 February 2008 5:58 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] User umehlig and some really nasty edits
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
few others in the
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly destroyed. Basically 522-603 and a
few others in the 1000's have
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23 +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a large number of low
number nodes that have been utterly
On Feb 6, 2008 8:39 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:23 +, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:57 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know who/what they are, but there are a
If the server were to provide the original timestamp as an additional
attribute, and reject if it didn't match on upload, then problems like this
could be prevented.
It would also be a proper solution to update conflicts.
80n
On Feb 6, 2008 6:05 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder)
[EMAIL
80n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 06 February 2008 9:12 PM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder)
Cc: Dave Stubbs; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] User umehlig and some really nasty edits
If the server were to provide the original timestamp as an additional
attribute, and reject
16 matches
Mail list logo
