Hello
The imagery seems to be also more recent than SPW (less than 1 year in LLN and Chaumont area ; I didn't check in other areas). Yep, definitely useful ! Thibaut On May 12, 2017 8:51 AM, joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: Yes, they even seemed to prioritize areas which had no decent coverage at all. For example, I checked my "area of interest" in Bolivia, and there's a lot of new woods to map (I like to following the outline of civilization): http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/-17.3651/-65.2039 Tais just pointed out that in Congo as well, some places are now mapable that weren't before. So if you had some areas of interest that had bad imagery before, now you will probably have something better. As for Belgium: the imagery seems to be much more recent than Bing, check for example here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/50.63689/4.17203 I for one am not going to use SPW imagery until we have a more official letter from them, so for my Walloon mapping, this is definitely useful. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap | Twitter | LinkedIn | Meetup
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
