That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started.
Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure
there's not another waste of energy beforehand.
Yves
Le 27 juin 2023 12:46:50 GMT+02:00, Marc_marc a écrit :
>Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via t
Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano"
a écrit :
>
>And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten
>done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated
>editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly
Le 10 janvier 2023 08:12:43 GMT+01:00, Snusmumriken
a écrit :
>On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 23:06 +, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> On 09/01/2023 20:17, Snusmumriken wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 08:21 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > > You seem unwilling to understand that defining a way to refer to
Le 9 janvier 2023 16:19:14 GMT+01:00, Niels Elgaard Larsen a
écrit :
>
>I sometimes do get annoyed at especially new mappers that often
>excessively delete and recreates objects. Because it obscures the
>history.
>
If it is a trend for new mappers, which I understand well because sometimes it
Le 6 janvier 2023 15:49:53 GMT+01:00, "Sören Reinecke" a
écrit :
>
>Better would be to have a separate FOSS platform for storing POI information
>using a permanent identifier connected to OSM somehow e.g. by a key
>"somepoiplatformid". But no one created such a platform yet.
>
Probably
Gps logger was perfect, unfortunately :
https://github.com/mendhak/gpslogger/issues/849
Yves
Le 20 décembre 2020 19:43:00 GMT+01:00, Martijn van Exel a
écrit :
>Andy,
>
>If you would like something lightweight that just does GPS track recording, I
>would recommend GPS Logger
Niels, Arnalielsewhere post wasn't about mapping, the map is used to illustrate
something.
I agree with others comments pledging for more time to be taken to read someone
else's lines.
Yves___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Really fun to see usernames where your brain expect places, I love it!
Makes me want to check on neighborhood, so it's a good work.
Yves
Le 20 octobre 2020 15:31:15 GMT+02:00, Darafei Praliaskouski via talk
a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>Fixed links:
>
>Kontur OpenStreetMap Antiquity:
Out of topic content. There is discussions about being more welcoming on this
list, along with being open to other communications channels. Even with that in
mind, I must admit I hadn't logged in or subscribed to slack to check on the
discussion while the topic may be of interest.
By any means,
Operator or network tags are often quoted for this kind of network. However I
find it difficult not to wish for putting 'name=Boulder Valley Ranch Trails'
somewhere, and a relation seems a good candidate.
network:name=Boulder Valley Ranch Trails? But the network tag and its
acronyms values
Le 1 août 2020 22:08:17 GMT+02:00, Martin Koppenhoefer
a écrit :
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> On 1. Aug 2020, at 20:48, Yves via talk wrote:
>>
>> This would be better joined in a site relation.
>
>
>why should it? What’s the benefit? How is this diffe
This would be better joined in a site relation.
Yves
Le 1 août 2020 18:20:27 GMT+02:00, Mike Thompson a écrit :
>I have come across a number of examples[0] of route relations where all the
>trails in a given park have been put into a single relation. Is this a
>recommended use for route
12 matches
Mail list logo
