On Sep 28, 2012 7:27 AM, THEVENON Julien julien_theve...@yahoo.fr wrote:
--
Le jeu. 27 sept. 2012 20:18 HAEC, Sarah Hoffmann a écrit :
This is the real problem for us.
For the sake of completeness: planetwide there are currently
152 million objects. Which means
From: THEVENON Julien [mailto:julien_theve...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:26 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Réf.: Re: All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
to be allowed to use cadastre data we have to add a source key which is
long about 40 characters
Am 30.09.2012 um 01:21 schrieb Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
My understanding is that the source=* tag is for mappers and cannot be
relied upon to provide attribution or for meeting a legal requirement.
Nothing in the OSM license prohibits a data consumer from removing tags and
From: THEVENON Julien [mailto:julien_theve...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:14 PM
To: penor...@mac.com; cqu...@openstreetmap.fr; si...@poole.ch
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Réf.: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
Le ven. 28
On 28 Sep 2012, at 06:25, THEVENON Julien julien_theve...@yahoo.fr wrote:
--
Le jeu. 27 sept. 2012 20:18 HAEC, Sarah Hoffmann a écrit :
This is the real problem for us.
For the sake of completeness: planetwide there are currently
152 million
I know.
My thinking is that the source tag would be better placed on the changeset
rather than polluting the whole db with source tags and source tags for each
and every tag on each object which is starting to happen. You can then use the
changeset info to synthesise the source info down to
Shaun McDonald wrote:
My thinking is that the source tag would be better placed on the changeset
rather than polluting the whole db with source tags and source tags for each and
every tag on each object which is starting to happen. You can then use the
changeset info to synthesise the source
I would prefer to keep the source tag with the object. Within a changeset I
will often have some roads where source is GPS, have traced some buildings from
bing, and added a few pub/shop names where source is survey
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 28/09/2012 8:55 Shaun McDonald wrote:
I
Select way or node.
Click advanced.
Click way/node number.
Click more details.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 28/09/2012 9:21 Lester Caine wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
My thinking is that the source tag would be better placed on the changeset
rather than polluting the whole db with
Philip Barnes wrote:
Select way or node.
Click advanced.
Click way/node number.
Click more details.
You don't even need the fourth step - the dialogue that appears when you
click the way/node id is the history.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Philip Barnes wrote:
Select way or node.
Click advanced.
Click way/node number.
Click more details.
I think that the question was about changeset tags, in which case there
are a couple more steps:
View History.
Choose the changeset to view information for, and click it.
Here's an
Someoneelse wrote:
Is there any easy way (in any editor with any plugin) of getting to
this information - preferably a collated list of object / changeset tags?
I've just done this in P2's history dialogue for 'comment' and 'source':
Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk writes:
I would prefer to keep the source tag with the object. Within a changeset I
will often have some roads where source is GPS, have traced some buildings from
bing, and added a few pub/shop names where source is survey
Changeset info can be
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Someoneelse wrote:
Is there any easy way (in any editor with any plugin) of getting to
this information - preferably a collated list of object / changeset tags?
I've just done this in P2's history dialogue for 'comment' and 'source':
--
Le ven. 28 sept. 2012 02:13 HAEC, Paul Norman a écrit :
Obviously buildings are part of it, but is there a list of what else?
Hi,
I don't think there is a list.
the information that you can find are highway references,street names,city
boundaries,cemetery
--
Le jeu. 27 sept. 2012 20:18 HAEC, Sarah Hoffmann a écrit :
This is the real problem for us.
For the sake of completeness: planetwide there are currently
152 million objects. Which means 1/6th of the planet consists of
French buildings. Now, there is a real
--
Le mer. 26 sept. 2012 21:48 HAEC, Lester Caine a écrit
Looking at the source material, there is nothing which can be used to separate
the blocks displayed into separate buildings, and since we have no means of
identifying different levels of building, adding
THEVENON Julien wrote:
Personally I would prefer to
seehttp://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/funnybuilding.png as a single closed
outline box. If the vectors are not providing closed objects then there is
something wrong with the data anyway and in my book it should not be allowed to
be
18 matches
Mail list logo
