Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions?

2023-02-02 Thread Andy Townsend

On 02/02/2023 17:08, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:

Looks like most of these have been cleaned up but there's a couple left:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qU8



Some of the links are to other websites, e.g. the fishing area 
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/148514524 .


It might well just be a good-faith attempt to "add websites to OSM" 
rather than to drive traffic to any particular sites, although the 
selection of sites seems very narrow :) .  In the example above, the 
site appears to be a 3rd-party one, but is the first search engine 
result after the local group's Facebook page.


Best Regards,

Andy



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions?

2023-02-02 Thread Niels Elgaard Larsen

Dave F via talk:

...

 From the wiki:
The website tag can be used to provide the full URL to the *official website.

*These are clearly not official.


It is not so clear in my opinion.

There are a lot of links to subdomains of areafish.com.

Offical websites does not have to be on second level domains.

according to https://areafish.com/we-offer/
they offer various plan for hosting websites.

So if these put fishing lakes are customers of areafish.com and can edit and 
update their websites, I would call them official.


Some of the websites are tagged on e.g. just natural=water, they should be on fishing 
nodes.


But it often not clear if a website is official. There are a lot of pizza places here 
in DK that do have their own second level domains.
  But the content is very similar and based on the same few templates. And developed 
by some food order & delivery company. (eg EatOnline). When you order from them, it 
is handled by the same backend. And they never list a phone number so that you can 
call and order without using the order company, even then such a number do 
exists. I suspect that the pizza makers can add menu items and prices but otherwise 
have little control over the website.
  But I guess we have to accept them as official if they are printed on store 
fronts, paper menus, etc. And we should make an effort to tag the phone numbers in OSM.




--
Niels Elgaard Larsen


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions?

2023-02-02 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
Looks like most of these have been cleaned up but there's a couple left:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qU8

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:13 AM Dave F via talk 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> You may wish to take a look at these changesets by a single contributor to
> decide if  you think these are  dubious websites added to tourist
> attractions.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aliaksandr%20Kopyshau/history#map=1/37/3
>
> The one in my locale had poor spelling (translation to English?) &
> grammar, took a long time to load & claimed if was copyright of the
> organisation/object that the webpage was about, even though it clearly
> wasn't (It was a bridge owned by the local authority).
>
> They all have similar, yet slightly different URLs
>
> From the wiki:
> The website tag can be used to provide the full URL to the
>
> *official website. *These are clearly not official.
>
> DaveF
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Dubious websites added to tourist attractions?

2023-02-02 Thread Dave F via talk

Hi

You may wish to take a look at these changesets by a single contributor 
to decide if  you think these are  dubious websites added to tourist 
attractions.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aliaksandr%20Kopyshau/history#map=1/37/3

The one in my locale had poor spelling (translation to English?) & 
grammar, took a long time to load & claimed if was copyright of the 
organisation/object that the webpage was about, even though it clearly 
wasn't (It was a bridge owned by the local authority).


They all have similar, yet slightly different URLs

From the wiki:
The website tag can be used to provide the full URL to the *official 
website.


*These are clearly not official.

DaveF
**___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk