On Jan 17, 2008 11:00 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 12:52 PM, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
After my missive in the postal addresses thread I had yet another
scout
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 3:42 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any particular objections against your proposal (although it is
somewhat complex), but I still think geographic boundaries are the way to
go. Which do you think will happen first: Creation
On Jan 18, 2008 9:01 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 3:42 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any particular objections against your proposal (although
it is
somewhat complex), but I still think geographic
On Jan 18, 2008 3:42 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any particular objections against your proposal (although it is
somewhat complex), but I still think geographic boundaries are the way to
go. Which do you think will happen first: Creation of boundaries and a way
to
Lester Caine wrote:
After my missive in the postal addresses thread I had yet another scout around
on what is already available and how it is not being managed well.
All mapping is currently based on physical nodes, but I think that perhaps we
need an abstract element that we can hang
Karl Newman wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 12:52 PM, Lukasz Stelmach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
After my missive in the postal addresses thread I had yet another
scout around
on what is already available and how it is not being
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 09:40 +, Lester Caine wrote:
Taking an example
* place=village
* name=Ryde
* is_in=England, Isle of Wight, Hampshire
SHOULD be is_in=Isle of Wight
With
* place=county
* name=Isle of Wight
* is_in=Hampshire
*
7 matches
Mail list logo
