------------------------------ Le sam. 23 févr. 2013 10:58 HNEC, Simon Poole a écrit : > >The "relatively restrictive" is conjecture by you. > >At least my intention is have a as liberal as possible policy that still >makes it clear that we want usage of the relevant names/marks to be >non-confusing and factually correct (for example we would not want any >of the other actors in the geo-data space using OpenStreetMap as a brand >for their products if they do not contain 100% OSM data). > >Wrt RMS: it suffices to point out that GNU is a trademark of the FSF. > >Simon Hi, In case you are not aware of, Debian has made an announcement about " Debian's hassle-free trademarks" [1] . I think that the problematic is quite similar to the one with OSM branding so it could be perhaps interesting to look at what has been done on their side and check if it can be usefull to reuse some ideas. 1 http://www.debian.org/News/2013/20130301.en.html My 2 cents... Cheers Julien _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
