Re: [OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

2020-08-13 Thread Roland Olbricht via talk
Hi all, There is a new release of the Overpass API https://dev.overpass-api.de/releases/osm-3s_v0.7.56.6.tar.gz that adheres to these rules. Unfortunately, getting network communication right is hard. In that version, there is a race condition. For that reason, there is another new release

Re: [OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

2020-08-13 Thread Roland Olbricht via talk
Hi all, in the minute diff, in file https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz the way 40657824 uses node 7804408284, but that node is contained neither in 694.osc.gz nor in any earlier minute diff. It's in 693 as far as I can see? Tom I would like to thank mmd

Re: [OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

2020-08-12 Thread mmd
Am 12.08.20 um 15:40 schrieb Tom Hughes via talk: > On 12/08/2020 13:56, Roland Olbricht via talk wrote: > >> in the minute diff, in file >> https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz >> the way 40657824 uses node 7804408284, but that node is contained >> neither in

Re: [OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

2020-08-12 Thread Tom Hughes via talk
On 12/08/2020 13:56, Roland Olbricht via talk wrote: in the minute diff, in file https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz the way 40657824 uses node 7804408284, but that node is contained neither in 694.osc.gz nor in any earlier minute diff. It's in 693 as far

[OSM-talk] Referential integrity of https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz

2020-08-12 Thread Roland Olbricht via talk
Dear all, in the minute diff, in file https://planet.openstreetmap.org/replication/minute//004/146/694.osc.gz the way 40657824 uses node 7804408284, but that node is contained neither in 694.osc.gz nor in any earlier minute diff. In addition, it looks like there are large batches of nodes