On 09/06/2020 18:40, Simon Poole wrote:
[snip]
Based on information in this thread and private conversation with some
of OSMF members, it looks like Mapbox has treated the iD project as
owned by OSMF from the beginning. Furthermore, I've been told iD
maintainers are happy with the proposed
@openstreetmap.org; nd...@redhazel.co.uk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Toward resolution of controversies related to iD
> Who owns the iD project now? What's happened after "nearly all of the
> original authors left Mapbox", has the project ownership been transferred
> from Mapbox to OSMF, or
> Who owns the iD project now? What's happened after "nearly all of the
> original authors left Mapbox", has the project ownership been transferred
> from Mapbox to OSMF, or perhaps to current maintainers? Does Mapbox still
> retain the ownership rights to the project (even if they don't
Am 09.06.2020 um 18:04 schrieb nd...@redhazel.co.uk:
>
> Who owns the iD project now? What's happened after "nearly all of the
> original authors left Mapbox", has the project ownership been
> transferred from Mapbox to OSMF, or perhaps to current maintainers?
> Does Mapbox still retain the
On 09/06/2020 16:00, Simon Poole wrote:
Nearly all of the original authors left Mapbox a long time ago, nobody
working on it today is an "original author". The grant that Mapbox
received at the time was clearly instrumental in allowing them to start
growing the company to its current size, so
Am 09.06.2020 um 14:18 schrieb Mikel Maron:
> ---
>
> As it should be.
Mapbox developers decide on (not just have input on) budgets, product
specs etc etc etc etc etc etc for the company?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Frederik has already corrected most of your misconceptions, so just some
additional comments;
Am 09.06.2020 um 12:32 schrieb nd...@redhazel.co.uk:
>
> - Taking control from the original authors would slow down, if not
> stall, the development of iD.
>
Nearly all of the original authors left
Hey I have some other things to say on this thread, but quickly this point is
based on incorrect assumptions
> But if push comes to shove, and someone
needs to decide how something is done, do we want US tech firms to decide what
the official OSM editor does, or do we want the OSMF to decide
Hi,
On 2020-06-09 12:32, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
> To me, OSMF wants the control of a project it hasn't developed but
> turned out too successful to ignore,
The iD editor has been originally built by Mapbox funded by a grant from
the Knight Foundation with the aim of being a good editor for
Jun 9, 2020, 12:32 by nd...@redhazel.co.uk:
> On 09/06/2020 09:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> On 6/9/20 02:53, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, can you please explain why do you think you should be able to
>>> influence decisions of the iD maintainer without forking the code,
>>>
Jun 9, 2020, 11:08 by saba...@gmail.com:
>
>
> Il giorno mar 9 giu 2020 alle ore 10:06 Frederik Ramm <> frede...@remote.org>
> > ha scritto:
>
>>
>> We are having this discussion because the assumption that if someone is
>> a good programmer they will also be good with gauging the will of
On 09/06/2020 09:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 6/9/20 02:53, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
Basically, can you please explain why do you think you should be able to
influence decisions of the iD maintainer without forking the code,
maintaining it yourself and in the end competing with iD on a level
You are invited to organize a panel about that during SotM. We are just
creating space for panels, workshops and other free sessions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_of_the_Map_2020/self-organized_sessions_howto
Am 08.06.20 um 22:41 schrieb Dorothea Kazazi:
> Hi all,
>
> The OSMF
Il giorno mar 9 giu 2020 alle ore 10:06 Frederik Ramm
ha scritto:
>
> We are having this discussion because the assumption that if someone is
> a good programmer they will also be good with gauging the will of the
> OSM community has proven wrong; iD is a good editor but the iD team has
> too
Hi,
On 6/9/20 02:53, nd...@redhazel.co.uk wrote:
> Basically, can you please explain why do you think you should be able to
> influence decisions of the iD maintainer without forking the code,
> maintaining it yourself and in the end competing with iD on a level
> playing field.
I think that we
On 08/06/2020 21:41, Dorothea Kazazi wrote:
The OSMF board is asking for comments on possible approaches to
resolving controversies related to upgrades to and modifications of the
iD editor. Please read the post by Allan Mustard:
Hi all,
The OSMF board is asking for comments on possible approaches to
resolving controversies related to upgrades to and modifications of the
iD editor. Please read the post by Allan Mustard:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2020/06/08/toward-resolution-of-controversies-related-to-id/
Feel free
17 matches
Mail list logo
