Re: [OSM-talk] admin_level=2 overlaps (was: Re: OSMF silently sides with Russia?)

[Ilya Zverev]

After I sent the message, I’ve read in the wiki about this part of 
Serbian-Croatian border:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/45.7313/18.9257

Parts to the left of the river are controlled by Croatia, parts to the right — 
by Serbia, but administrative relations do not reflect that.

Ilya
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] admin_level=2 overlaps (was: Re: OSMF silently sides with Russia?)

[Andy Townsend]

On 21/11/2018 13:47, Christoph Hormann wrote:

On Wednesday 21 November 2018, Ilya Zverev wrote:

[...]

To conclude, if we remove Kafia Kingi from the South Sudan relation,
there will be no notable violations to the 2013 agreement on our map
— though only by means of having one country overlap another.

I am inclined to concur.

For completeness: ... (more exampes snipped) ...


Another one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8692572 west of Ceuta - 
it's an outer of Spain but not an inner of Morocco - they've "agreed to 
differ" on it for the time being. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Perejil%20Island?uselang=en-GB#Sovereignty 
has some more info.  In this example I think that overlapping 
admin_level=2 is the best reflection of the on-the-ground situation.


This also presents a rendering conundrum for any renderer that wants to 
indicate the status as there isn't an easy way of showing "outer of one 
admin_level=2 but not an inner of another".


Best Regards,

Andy


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk