Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Stephan Plepelits
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. For the area of the hotel: amenity=hotel And for the hotel itself: amenity=hotel, building=yes (For reference see amnenity=university)

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Mark Williams
Stephan Plepelits wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. For the area of the hotel: amenity=hotel And for the hotel itself: amenity=hotel, building=yes (For

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread John McKerrell
On 6 Aug 2009, at 07:47, Mark Williams wrote: Stephan Plepelits wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. For the area of the hotel: amenity=hotel And for the hotel

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Lester Caine
Stephan Plepelits wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. For the area of the hotel: amenity=hotel And for the hotel itself: amenity=hotel, building=yes (For

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/8/6 John McKerrell j...@mckerrell.net: On 6 Aug 2009, at 07:47, Mark Williams wrote: Stephan Plepelits wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:54:01PM -0700, Joseph Scanlan wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels?  I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. For the area of the

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Joseph Scanlan
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Lester Caine wrote: Currently there SHOULD be a landuse/natural tag for each area on a map as using amenity= creates another level of complexity. One may still has to decide what to use for landuse if the tag itself is missing. I still think 'landuse=natural' with a sub

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/8/6 Joseph Scanlan n7...@arrl.net: I suppose if a hotel is surrounded by commercial landuse then there's no point making a little retail island to hold it. +1 Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-05 Thread Ciarán Mooney
What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. I'm going to go with commercial, they as retail suggests that they sell a physical product. Ciarán ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-05 Thread OJ W
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Ciarán Mooneygeneral.moo...@googlemail.com wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels?  I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. I'm going to go with commercial, they as retail suggests that they sell a physical product. commercial suggests office

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-05 Thread John McKerrell
On 5 Aug 2009, at 21:31, OJ W wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Ciarán Mooneygeneral.moo...@googlemail.com wrote: What landuse are we using for hotels? I'm pretty sure it should be commercial or retail. I'm going to go with commercial, they as retail suggests that they sell a

Re: [OSM-talk] landuse for hotels

2009-08-05 Thread Nic Roets
Could even be farmland or nature reserve e.g. Singita Lodge. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:04 PM, John McKerrell j...@mckerrell.net wrote: On 5 Aug 2009, at 21:31, OJ W wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Ciarán Mooneygeneral.moo...@googlemail.com wrote: What landuse are we using for