On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 05:43 +, Ihe Onwuka wrote:
> ..are there any drawbacks to always using the general comparison form
>
> thisThing = ('thatThing')
>
> rather than
>
> thisThing eq 'thatThing'
>
> even when you know that you are dealing with a singleton sequence.
I find I can catch a lo
..are there any drawbacks to always using the general comparison form
thisThing = ('thatThing')
rather than
thisThing eq 'thatThing'
even when you know that you are dealing with a singleton sequence.
I am guessing this may be an implementation dependent issue.
_
Then the right answer was very close no just joking.
Thanks - nice that you don't have to do any unnecessary function wrapping.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Christian Grün
wrote:
>> but how close would
>> (floor,ceiling)[@firstpage + 1]($totalPagesDecimal) have been
>
> Try this:
>
> but how close would
> (floor,ceiling)[@firstpage + 1]($totalPagesDecimal) have been
Try this:
(floor#1,ceiling#1)[@firstpage + 1]($totalPagesDecimal)
___
talk@x-query.com
http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
So I have just written
if (@firstpage eq 0) then floor($totalPagesDecimal) else
ceiling($totalPagesDecimal)
but how close would
(floor,ceiling)[@firstpage + 1]($totalPagesDecimal) have been
I'm guessing I would at least have to put some function invoking
paraphenalia around the calls to floor
