Hi.
2009/3/8 Franc Carter
>
> I assumed it is copyrighted however, so not a valid source for OSM ;-(
>
Yes I agree. Given the complicated nature of the boundary in this area
(according to the Lands dept) I don't think copying their data without
permission is a good idea (and their license would
I assumed it is copyrighted however, so not a valid source for OSM ;-(
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Narelle Irvine wrote:
> The Dept of Lands database was said to be 94% correct in 2007 and
> improving.
> Most of their errors relate to the house numbers on a street, and I
> would assume that
The Dept of Lands database was said to be 94% correct in 2007 and improving.
Most of their errors relate to the house numbers on a street, and I
would assume that their suburb boundaries are correct.
This data should take precendence over ABS data.
Regards,
Narelle.
2009/3/8 Franc Carter :
>
> I
3 matches
Mail list logo