Liz wrote:
> This Christmas Peter and I will be visiting Adelaide, so if we make one trip
> via the Sturt we could map one town / village reasonably well.
> Pre-plan and we'll have a virtual mapping party on the Sturt Highway.
If you zoom in on the whereis map, you'll see two roads whose names a
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm
Date: 2009/12/6
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Announce] OSMF license change vote has started
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> The ODbL is overseen by a board which, as well as Jordan, Charlott
2009/12/6 Elizabeth Dodd :
> I too am seeing a fork in Australia as a result of this.
At this stage it seems very early in the debate about if the new
license should be adopted, anything else will depend on the outcome of
that.
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/5 Liz :
> > Only those who belonged to OSMF in Oct 09 will get a vote. Those who are
> > 'merely' contributors will only get to be asked if they will relicense
> > their data or not. Only data from people who agree to relicensing will go
> > forward i
2009/12/5 Liz :
> Only those who belonged to OSMF in Oct 09 will get a vote. Those who are
> 'merely' contributors will only get to be asked if they will relicense their
> data or not. Only data from people who agree to relicensing will go forward
> into the new licence.
I wonder if this will be t
On 05/12/2009 21:31, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> The proposed licence is not a benefit to Australians in my view.
You have generously qualified this with "in my view" and I should point
out that I disagree with all the force I can muster.
I spent about two hours this morning writing a pretty detaile
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, James Livingston wrote:
> On 05/12/2009, at 7:10 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> > In places where this is the case, and there is no good survey data for
> > the creek, I generally re-use the way to be the creek as well.
>
> This is what I've been doing. If I know there is a currently u
On 05/12/2009, at 7:10 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> In places where this is the case, and there is no good survey data for the
> creek, I generally re-use the way to be the creek as well.
This is what I've been doing. If I know there is a currently unmapped
creek/river which roughly follows the bound
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, John Henderson wrote:
> > There is a lot of empty space in real life in that district.
>
> True, but compare these for an example of what I mean:
>
> http://www.whereis.com/sa/waikerie?id=21ADA5CC8AE6F4
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.1803&lon=140.017&zoom=14&layers=B0
Liz wrote:
> There is a lot of empty space in real life in that district.
True, but compare these for an example of what I mean:
http://www.whereis.com/sa/waikerie?id=21ADA5CC8AE6F4
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.1803&lon=140.017&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF
John
On 05/12/2009, at 11:30 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
> For clarity... the OSM Foundation is not some evil group...
> The OSMF is open, anyone from the community can join. The OSMF Board
> is democratically elected from the OSMF membership.
If anyone who isn't a OSMF member wants to read the discussion,
2009/12/5 Liz :
> Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the proposed new licence.
> It is designed around European law, and gives "database protection" which is
> not a legal concept which is likely to apply here, after the recent High Court
> case Nine vs IceTv, when the database wa
2009/12/5 80n <80n...@gmail.com>:
> The OSM Foundation can't "force" anyone to relicense their existing data
For clarity... the OSM Foundation is not some evil group...
The OSMF is open, anyone from the community can join. The OSMF Board
is democratically elected from the OSMF membership.
OSMF Boa
On 05/12/2009, at 10:29 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
> Certainly we should make this case clear to the OSM community.
> Database protection always seemed to be a euro-centric ideal and not
> one that the new licence analysis seemed to respond to adequately.
> However, I believe that the ODbL c
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Liz wrote:
> > There has been a great number of mails on osmf-talk about an upcoming
> vote on
> > the database licence.
> But no notice on the site or wiki. I suppose it isn't "official"
> discussio
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Liz wrote:
> There has been a great number of mails on osmf-talk about an upcoming vote on
> the database licence.
But no notice on the site or wiki. I suppose it isn't "official" discussion.
> Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the proposed new
There has been a great number of mails on osmf-talk about an upcoming vote on
the database licence.
Sadly, I'd like to say that I will not be supporting the proposed new licence.
It is designed around European law, and gives "database protection" which is
not a legal concept which is likely to a
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, John Henderson wrote:
> I should be there sometime during the Tour Down Under, if no-one else
> gets the opportunity before then.
>
> But a quick look around suggests there's a lot to be done all the way
> from Renmark.
>
> John
>
There is a lot of empty space in real life in t
I should be there sometime during the Tour Down Under, if no-one else
gets the opportunity before then.
But a quick look around suggests there's a lot to be done all the way
from Renmark.
John
Liz wrote:
> I've just put in some of Blanchetown SA
> I believe it has a grid of streets but my surv
I've just put in some of Blanchetown SA
I believe it has a grid of streets but my survey doesn't actually line up into
a neat grid
Then there is a random lot of roads near the Murray.
Any mapper going near Blanchetown, turn off the highway and improve on the
town please.
Liz
20 matches
Mail list logo
