On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, John Smith wrote:
> On 19 February 2010 10:10, Roy Wallace wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Andy Botting
wrote:
> >> "The Director would however approve the release of the data provided
> >> the usual terms of our licence agreement were in place. "
> >
> > They cl
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, David Murn wrote:
> Youve got a GPS, all you need is a
> compass, pen/paper and a little bit of high-school maths.
>
My high school maths is gone many years ago
But the suggestion is quite correct.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Tal
On 19 February 2010 18:38, Liz wrote:
> My high school maths is gone many years ago
> But the suggestion is quite correct.
Laser range finder wouldn't go astray either :)
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap
John Smith wrote
"Laser range finder wouldn't go astray either :)"
I think that this would make an interesting mapping party How many ways
can we find to map this wind farm without having hi-res imagery
or having to break down their gates.
1) compass,gps, high school maths.
2) theodalite, p
For those interested, here's the current draft released this evening:
http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/OSM_Local_Chapters_Draft_v0_3.pdf
My concerns about this still haven't been addressed and it doesn't
look like it will happen so I won't be at this stage pursuing any form
of a local chapter i
On 20 February 2010 00:05, Nick Hocking wrote:
> 1) compass,gps, high school maths.
> 2) theodalite, professional gps and a real live surveyor.
> 4) laser rangefinder + gps
These are all the same method, just slightly different tools... and #4
still needs a direction/compass...
> 3) photographi
David Murn wrote:
> Ive laid out powerlines across most of the ACT and Queanbeyan, so feel
> free to do the line from the wind farm to the Queanbeyan sub-station.
As well as the ways (power=line), shouldn't we be tagging the individual
nodes (pylons) also (power=tower), as is done here:
http://
I wrote:
> As well as the ways (power=line), shouldn't we be tagging the individual
> nodes (pylons) also (power=tower), as is done here:
Oops, wrong URL. Try:
http://www.osm.org/?lat=-27.44862&lon=153.11414&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
John H
___
Talk-a
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, John Smith wrote:
> For those interested, here's the current draft released this evening:
>
> http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/OSM_Local_Chapters_Draft_v0_3.pdf
>
> My concerns about this still haven't been addressed and it doesn't
> look like it will happen so I won't be a
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 05:16 +1100, John Henderson wrote:
> David Murn wrote:
>
> > Ive laid out powerlines across most of the ACT and Queanbeyan, so feel
> > free to do the line from the wind farm to the Queanbeyan sub-station.
>
> As well as the ways (power=line), shouldn't we be tagging the ind
> Yes - If they're red and just that exact distance from the road then I quess
> it should be a postbox.
> I can't work out the telephone boxes in Queanbeyan from the imagery. so I'm
> still surveying them.
some/lots of the telephone box's in Sydney are very distinctive ;-)
>
> Nick
--
Franc
On 20 February 2010 12:47, Liz wrote:
> I wrote a note about this draft, decided it could be libellous and haven't
> posted it publically.
It's only libelous if unfounded...
> I'll merely say that if they are the terms, I wouldn't be able to join the
> local chapter.
This is why I've decided to
David Murn wrote:
> Ive been tagging all nodes as power=tower where its evident from nearmap
> that there is a large metal tower, however rendered tiles only show the
> power=tower nodes, not the power=pylon nodes.
Yes, I see them rendering now. I'd picked an unfortunately small sample
earlier.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Nick Hocking wrote:
> 1) compass,gps, high school maths.
You mean triangulation? My GPS (garmin oregon 550) comes so close to
supporting this natively with its built in compass, but falls short.
It has a mode which lets you point at an object, then estimate a
dis
14 matches
Mail list logo
