Re: [talk-au] Tagging stormwater drain areas?

On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:27:56 +0800, Stephen Hope wrote: > Is this what you are talking about? > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/basin%3Dinfiltration > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034383.html I had looked at basin=infiltration and for some

[talk-au] Fwd: [Aust-NZ] guide to spatial acronyms

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ross Johnson Date: 17 May 2010 16:06 Subject: [Aust-NZ] guide to spatial acronyms To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org This is a handy guide for deciphering acronyms used in the spatial industry! http://www.icsm.gov.au/icsm/publications/ACRONYMS_and_JARGON.

Re: [talk-au] Broadcast tower locations

On 17 May 2010 15:07, Steve Bennett wrote: > Is that because you're worried there will be a lot of duplicates with > existing data in metro areas? Could you perhaps import it all, but Some people were upset at previous imports in metro areas. ___ Talk-

Re: [talk-au] Tagging stormwater drain areas?

On 17 May 2010 15:27, Stephen Hope wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/basin%3Dinfiltration +1, waterway=drain according to current wiki doco only applied to ways ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists

Re: [talk-au] Tagging stormwater drain areas?

Andrew, Is this what you are talking about? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/basin%3Dinfiltration http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034383.html Stephen On 17 May 2010 14:15, Andrew Gregory wrote: > I'd like to thank everyone who replied. While t

Re: [talk-au] Tagging stormwater drain areas?

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote: > I'd like to thank everyone who replied. While there were some suggestions, > it seems nobody else is worrying about these, so I guess with no > established convention I'll go with waterway=drain;area=yes. > waterway=drain because I've seen m

Re: [talk-au] Broadcast tower locations

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:13 PM, John Smith wrote: > I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk > importing the non-metro data sets and then offering the metro data > sets on a request basis, or is there a better way to handle this and > other similar data sets? Is that

[talk-au] Fwd: [Aust-NZ] The National Plan for Environmental Information [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

-- Forwarded message -- From: Bruce Bannerman Date: 17 May 2010 14:30 Subject: [Aust-NZ] The National Plan for Environmental Information [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] To: "aust...@lists.osgeo.org" fyi: http://www.environment.gov.au/npei/ Bruce _

Re: [talk-au] Broadcast tower locations

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:13 PM, John Smith wrote: > > I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk > importing the non-metro data sets and then offering the metro data > sets on a request basis, or is there a better way to handle this and > other similar data sets? Splitt

Re: [talk-au] New gateway motorway bridge duplication

On Sun, 16 May 2010 11:02:32 +0800, Liz wrote: >> BTW, OSM had the extension rendered the day after! :) >> > well its not finished on its satellite photo so what do you expect? I expect "osm-updated-the-day-it-opens-sometimes-before" from all my maps now :) -- Andrew Gregory

Re: [talk-au] Tagging stormwater drain areas?

I'd like to thank everyone who replied. While there were some suggestions, it seems nobody else is worrying about these, so I guess with no established convention I'll go with waterway=drain;area=yes. waterway=drain because I've seen many of these sites with signs marked "drainage area". ar

[talk-au] Broadcast tower locations

CC-by dataset just turned up: http://data.australia.gov.au/622 It seems pretty straight forward to convert this to .osm format, suitable for JOSM. However I'm after suggestions on how to deal with the .osm file(s). I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk importing th

Re: [talk-au] New gateway motorway bridge duplication

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:56 AM, John Smith wrote: > There is a lot of weird street view locations where the roads have > been realigned but the map data hasn't caught up... Yeah, here's an interesting one I came across a while ago: http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&hq=&ll=-37.632077,144.069471&sp

Re: [talk-au] New gateway motorway bridge duplication

On 16 May 2010 22:17, Stephen Hope wrote: > Second, on Thursday they had a pre-opening ceremony, with assorted > politicians and reporters being pretty much the only people there, to > welcome google to the bridge. A google streetview car was the "first" This might be big enough that we should d

Re: [talk-au] New gateway motorway bridge duplication

A couple of things about the bridge. First, even though it was officially opened today, it doesn't have traffic on it until Monday week (24th). Then they do changes to the approaches, and a bit later shut the old bridge down for six months for refurbishment. We'll have to keep changing things her