On 28/06/2010, at 11:10 PM, Markus wrote:
Sound good to me to leave the GLR number and Ecolink if you put it with a
standard osm key.
Here's what I've currently got, any more comments?
1) National park get boundary=national_park and leisure=nature_reserve. Should
any of the standard,
Hi James,
Sorry but I have just been looking at the boundary=protected_area tag. It
appears it is a new tag someone has made to render specific ways using
KOSMOS rendering platform.
I am not sure if it is an approved tag. Although I quite like the idea of
it.
May need to use the
On 29 June 2010 23:18, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
I am not sure if it is an approved tag. Although I quite like the idea of
it.
If it serves a useful purpose and it doesn't duplicate the
functionality of another tag already well used, then just use it,
tags don't need to be official,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:49 PM, James Livingston
li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Here's what I've currently got, any more comments?
...
Is it worth using an additional
classification:qld=national_park|conservation_park|state_forest, etc.
(or similar), just to make things extra clear?
That is,
On 29 June 2010 21:49, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
3) State Forests get landuse=forest. Any leisure activities (e.g camping) get
marked as their own thing, like tourism=camp_site, which isn't in this dataset
4) Forest Reserves and Timber Reserve (which are often adjacent to
On 30 June 2010 11:55, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you actually going to put the fact that it is a State forest
anywhere? Sure, landuse=forest is not a problem, but some sort of tag
stating that it is a state forest (as opposed to private land) sounds
appropriate.
Most state
6 matches
Mail list logo
