On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
wrote:
> Well it appears as though people have been tagging them as
> landuse=recreation_ground (as per Melbourne Showgrounds) which seems the
> closest approximation to what it is.
landuse=recreation_ground
recreation_ground=showground
?
Steve
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> What goes in to a good change set comment? Should it include the
> nature of your edits, the sources used, edit theme, and location?
> What else?
You might want to back up a bit and ask "what purpose do changesets serve"?
For me, they don'
Not sure I like that option Steve as it implies that the recreation_ground
is only a showground.
I prefer the landuse=showground option and then, if there is an oval that is
used for recreation within the showground you tag that accordingly ie
leisure=pitch, sport=*. In the end it comes down to th
On 30 July 2010 07:19, John Smith wrote:
>
> That's going to be a very messy area to deal with, because it requires
> people sourcing or attributing perfectly all the time.
>
> On a different topic of sourcing, as I mentionned some time ago, Spot
Images will be releasing images of France in the n
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> Well unless recreation includes purchasing showbags and eating
> fairy floss :)
What about the rides?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 30 July 2010 19:40, Emilie Laffray wrote:
> On a different topic of sourcing, as I mentionned some time ago, Spot Images
> will be releasing images of France in the near future for a period of 6
> months. The attribution is very important to them and that's why someone is
> coding a plugin in J
On 30 July 2010 11:13, John Smith wrote:
>
> Not entirely what I meant, if you checked the other thread on how to
> add source=* tags it's actually complicated when you update data, but
> only update a small section so on and so forth.
>
Yup, hence the reason I mentioned it was about a different
On 30 July 2010 20:24, Emilie Laffray wrote:
> Yup, hence the reason I mentioned it was about a different topic of
> sourcing, and I couldn't find the previous thread.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2010-July/006868.html
___
Talk-au m
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
wrote:
> Not sure I like that option Steve as it implies that the recreation_ground
> is only a showground.
> I prefer the landuse=showground option and then, if there is an oval that is
> used for recreation within the showground you tag that acco
Mackay imagery seems to be online now as well:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#Queensland
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Toowoomba imagery is now online as well...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 30 July 2010 22:27, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> Meh. I look at the definition of landuse=recreation_ground and I think
> it could include almost anything. Maybe you're right. There are so few
> showgrounds it won't matter much either way.
>
> Steve
Actually there are a lot of showgrounds. Pretty
On 30/07/2010, at 3:54 PM, John Smith wrote:
> I've cc'd Grant on this email, he posted to the #osm-au IRC channel
> about some proposed changes to the CTs, which I was hoping would have
> come up in another thread by now:
>
> "LWG is considering:
>
> 3. OSMF agrees to use or sub-license Your Con
13 matches
Mail list logo