Re: [talk-au] Does this mean?.....

2010-12-21 Thread Richard Colless
On 21/12/2010 2:04 PM, Ian Sergeant wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote: Since taking a photo of something entails little or no "independent intellectual effort", On 21 December 2010

[talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread Andrew Harvey
For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275lon=151.13694zoom=17layers=M Along the edge of the bay/water there is land-- | --trees in water-- | -- water A BC In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657 I moved the edge

Re: [talk-au] Does this mean?.....

2010-12-21 Thread Ian Sergeant
I wrote : And even non-artistic photography... [is copyrightable] However, this case draws a real distinction between the human process of originality, and an automated process according to a set of rules. I've no doubt that if I take a photo out of an aeroplane window that copyright

Re: [talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275lon=151.13694zoom=17layers=M Along the edge of the bay/water there is land-- | --trees in water-- | -- water  A                  B                C In

Re: [talk-au] mapping marsh at the edge of a bay

2010-12-21 Thread info
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275lon=151.13694zoom=17layers=M Along the edge of the bay/water there is land-- | --trees in water-- | -- water  A                  B                C In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657 I moved the edge of the