Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith wrote: > amenity=restaurant > licensed=yes/no/byo Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist, including licensed *and* byo (with corkage, usually), and licensed *and not* byo. licensed=yes/no byo=yes/no Steve _

Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread SomeoneElse
On 24/01/2011 23:08, John Smith wrote: Not all restaurants are licensed... amenity=restaurant licensed=yes/no/byo Sounds good to me - thanks. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t

Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread Franc Carter
seems sensible as the tag can be applied generally cheers On 25/01/2011 10:08 AM, "John Smith" wrote: > On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse wrote: >> Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced >> restaurants? > > Not all restaurants are licensed... > > amenity=rest

Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread John Smith
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse wrote: > Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced > restaurants? Not all restaurants are licensed... amenity=restaurant licensed=yes/no/byo ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstree

Re: [talk-au] Victorian Coastline

2011-01-24 Thread 4x4falcon
On 24/01/11 07:10, Steve Bennett wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ian Sergeant wrote: Having a separate layer may be appropriate for data we are considering importing to OSM that will never need to be user modified. Data in this category is better combined with OSM as a post-processing