On 25/02/11 11:35, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:59 AM, 4x4falcon wrote:
I have reported this and as yet osm will not put a block on the user
Who is "osm" in this context?
Steve
osm data working group as per all vandalism requests.
Cheers
Ross
___
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:59 AM, 4x4falcon wrote:
> I have reported this and as yet osm will not put a block on the user
Who is "osm" in this context?
Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/t
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:12 +1100, {withheld} wrote:
> However I still hold the community should accept the offer and be
> grateful. Carping about internal politics just looks bad. And whiny. And
> doesn't encourage anybody else ever offering similar largesse ever again.
Well, to be fair, the comm
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robin Paulson
Date: 25 February 2011 10:42
Subject: [OSM-talk] Crisis mapping - assistance requested for
infrastructure mapping in Christchurch
To: OSM Talk , h...@openstreetmap.org
Hi OSM mappers,
As most of you are probably aware, we had a severe e
I also meant to say please don't change anything in this changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6692493
as I want to use it to try reverting the vandalised items in it. Which
I will do middle of March.
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mail
Hi All,
As I pointed out here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg05776.html
in june last year there were a number of strange edits occuring.
Since then and particularly in December there have been a number of
cases of vandalism by this user.
I have reported this and a
6 matches
Mail list logo
