Re: [talk-au] Queensland border and the MacIntyre River...

On 9 May 2011 20:39, Tim Challis wrote: > To save you ploughing through it, the lightning summary seems to be > since 1946 the mid-line of the river is the answer you want. (If you > want to get technical, it should be the median line of the riverbanks as > they existed in 1859... the big catch is

Re: [talk-au] Queensland border and the MacIntyre River...

On 09/05/11 14:32, Christoph Donges wrote: > My father, who lived on a property adjoining the river near Texas for > many years says he always believed the boarder ran down the center of > the river. > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:07 PM, John Smith > wrote: > >

Re: [talk-au] Canberra mapping - nearly up-to-date.

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:03 +1000, John Smith wrote: > On 9 May 2011 01:28, David Murn wrote: > > These current edits are of value to OSM, newly developed roads in > > developing suburbs ('some of which already have people living on them'). > > How can newly developed roads be mapped from Bing?

Re: [talk-au] Canberra Mapping - out of date

On 8 May 2011 17:47, John Smith wrote: > On 5 May 2011 10:33, David Murn wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 21:22 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately this has meant that Canberra OSM data is now badly out >>> of date. I have recently heard of a situation where up-to-date >>> Canberra dat

Re: [talk-au] Canberra mapping - nearly up-to-date.

On 9 May 2011 01:28, David Murn wrote: > These current edits are of value to OSM, newly developed roads in > developing suburbs ('some of which already have people living on them'). How can newly developed roads be mapped from Bing? ___ Talk-au mailing